AFK vs. FCNTX
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF (AFK) and Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX).
AFK is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones Africa Titans 50 Index. It was launched on Jul 10, 2008. FCNTX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 17, 1967.
Performance
AFK vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AFK vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFK VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF | -3.74% | 74.71% | 12.10% | -12.11% | -17.31% | 3.00% | 4.26% | 9.90% | -19.55% | 28.22% |
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund Fund | -8.57% | 21.76% | 36.00% | 38.67% | -28.31% | 24.52% | 32.48% | 30.00% | -3.81% | 32.18% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFK achieves a -3.74% return, which is significantly higher than FCNTX's -8.57% return. Over the past 10 years, AFK has underperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 5.78%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.63% annualized return.
AFK
- 1D
- 4.12%
- 1M
- -15.74%
- YTD
- -3.74%
- 6M
- 6.76%
- 1Y
- 49.61%
- 3Y*
- 18.56%
- 5Y*
- 6.13%
- 10Y*
- 5.78%
FCNTX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -9.40%
- YTD
- -8.57%
- 6M
- -6.17%
- 1Y
- 16.04%
- 3Y*
- 23.48%
- 5Y*
- 12.82%
- 10Y*
- 15.63%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AFK vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AFK has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AFK vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank
AFK
FCNTX
AFK vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF (AFK) and Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AFK | FCNTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.87 | 0.83 | +1.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.33 | 1.30 | +1.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.18 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.47 | 1.17 | +1.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.62 | 4.57 | +5.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AFK | FCNTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.87 | 0.83 | +1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.67 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | 0.80 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 0.76 | -0.76 |
Correlation
The correlation between AFK and FCNTX is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
AFK vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison
AFK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than FCNTX's 5.10% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFK VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF | 1.05% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 2.27% | 3.59% | 4.17% | 3.91% | 6.34% | 1.71% | 1.99% | 2.67% | 2.16% |
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund Fund | 5.10% | 5.21% | 4.19% | 3.78% | 11.87% | 10.80% | 8.01% | 4.16% | 7.46% | 6.08% | 3.81% | 5.33% |
Drawdowns
AFK vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFK drawdown since its inception was -62.46%, which is greater than FCNTX's maximum drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFK and FCNTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AFK | FCNTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.46% | -49.19% | -13.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.54% | -11.30% | -8.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.57% | -32.59% | -5.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.33% | -32.59% | -20.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.74% | -11.30% | -4.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.25% | -8.18% | -24.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.02% | 2.90% | +2.12% |
Volatility
AFK vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Africa Index ETF (AFK) has a higher volatility of 12.80% compared to Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX) at 5.19%. This indicates that AFK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AFK | FCNTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.80% | 5.19% | +7.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.11% | 10.56% | +10.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.67% | 19.69% | +6.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.56% | 19.13% | +2.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.12% | 19.61% | +2.51% |