AFIX vs. PIT

Last updated Jun 20, 2026

AFIX (Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF) and PIT (VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AFIX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Allspring, while PIT is a Commodities fund actively managed by VanEck. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AFIX returned 5.26% vs 39.38% for PIT. At a correlation of -0.23, they often move in opposite directions. AFIX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PIT.

Performance

AFIX vs. PIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF (AFIX) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFIX achieves a 0.73% return, which is significantly lower than PIT's 28.27% return.

AFIX

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: 0.90%
• YTD: 0.73%
• 6M: 0.80%
• 1Y: 5.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PIT

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: -10.27%
• YTD: 28.27%
• 6M: 29.77%
• 1Y: 39.38%
• 3Y*: 18.65%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFIX vs. PIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AFIX Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF	0.73%	7.52%	-1.56%
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF	28.27%	21.63%	1.40%

Correlation

The correlation between AFIX and PIT is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2024	-0.23

Return for Risk

AFIX vs. PIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFIX

AFIX Risk / Return Rank: 38
AFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
AFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
AFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 38
AFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
AFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 35

PIT

PIT Risk / Return Rank: 57
PIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
PIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
PIT Omega Ratio Rank: 55
PIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
PIT Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFIX vs. PIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF (AFIX) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AFIX	PIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.36	1.83	-0.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.04	2.37	-0.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.33	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.73	2.87	-1.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.03	11.34	-6.30

AFIX vs. PIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the PIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFIX and PIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AFIX vs. PIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFIX drawdown since its inception was -3.33%, smaller than the maximum PIT drawdown of -13.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFIX and PIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	AFIX	PIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.33%	-13.74%	+10.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.10%	-13.74%	+10.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.74%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.46%	-13.40%	+11.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.98%	-4.06%	+3.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.06%	3.48%	-2.42%

Volatility

AFIX vs. PIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF (AFIX) is 1.26%, while VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT) has a volatility of 4.96%. This indicates that AFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AFIX	PIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.26%	4.96%	-3.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.97%	19.37%	-16.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.93%	21.60%	-17.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.54%	17.50%	-12.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.54%	17.50%	-12.96%

AFIX vs. PIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFIX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than PIT's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

AFIX vs. PIT - Dividend Comparison

AFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.00%, less than PIT's 6.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AFIX Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF	5.00%	4.94%	0.38%	0.00%
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF	6.95%	8.92%	3.59%	6.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AFIX and PIT in my portfolio?

AFIX and PIT have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AFIX or PIT?

PIT has higher volatility (4.96%) compared to AFIX (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFIX dropped -3.33% vs PIT's -13.74%.

Which ETF is better, AFIX or PIT?

On 1-year performance, PIT leads with 39.38% vs 5.26% for AFIX. On fees, AFIX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, AFIX has been the lower-risk option at 1.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AFIX or PIT?

Over the 1-year period, PIT has performed better with a 39.38% return vs 5.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AFIX or PIT?

AFIX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AFIX or PIT?

PIT has the higher dividend yield at 6.95%, compared with 5.00% for AFIX.

What is the main difference between AFIX and PIT?

AFIX is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while PIT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Allspring and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for AFIX and 0.55% for PIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.