PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFIX vs. HTAB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AFIX vs. HTAB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF (AFIX) and Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF (HTAB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFIX achieves a 0.31% return, which is significantly lower than HTAB's 1.48% return.


AFIX

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.23%
YTD
0.31%
6M
0.22%
1Y
5.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HTAB

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.66%
YTD
1.48%
6M
1.64%
1Y
6.89%
3Y*
3.43%
5Y*
0.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFIX vs. HTAB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AFIX
Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF
0.31%7.52%-1.67%
HTAB
Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF
1.48%2.86%-2.15%

Correlation

The correlation between AFIX and HTAB is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2024

0.66

The correlation between AFIX and HTAB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFIX vs. HTAB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFIX
AFIX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
AFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
AFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

HTAB
HTAB Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
HTAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTAB Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
HTAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTAB Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFIX vs. HTAB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF (AFIX) and Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF (HTAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AFIXHTABDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.33

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

2.43

-0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.67

7.68

-2.01

AFIX vs. HTAB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the HTAB Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFIX and HTAB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AFIXHTABDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

1.72

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.44

+0.45

Drawdowns

AFIX vs. HTAB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFIX drawdown since its inception was -3.33%, smaller than the maximum HTAB drawdown of -14.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFIX and HTAB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFIXHTABDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.33%

-14.76%

+11.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.10%

-2.85%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.88%

-0.86%

-1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.96%

-2.89%

+1.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.00%

0.90%

+0.10%

Volatility

AFIX vs. HTAB - Volatility Comparison

Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF (AFIX) has a higher volatility of 1.42% compared to Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF (HTAB) at 1.25%. This indicates that AFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HTAB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFIXHTABDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.42%

1.25%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.87%

2.80%

+0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.97%

4.02%

-0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.55%

5.74%

-1.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.55%

5.17%

-0.62%

AFIX vs. HTAB - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFIX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than HTAB's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

AFIX vs. HTAB - Dividend Comparison

AFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.02%, more than HTAB's 3.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AFIX
Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF
5.02%4.94%0.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HTAB
Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF
3.83%3.88%3.57%3.21%2.26%2.18%1.64%2.77%1.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


AFIX and HTAB have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AFIX has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to HTAB (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFIX dropped -3.33% vs HTAB's -14.76%.

On 1-year performance, HTAB leads with 6.89% vs 5.65% for AFIX. On fees, AFIX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, HTAB has been the lower-risk option at 1.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HTAB has performed better with a 6.89% return vs 5.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AFIX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for HTAB.

AFIX has the higher dividend yield at 5.02%, compared with 3.83% for HTAB.

They also come from different issuers: Allspring and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for AFIX and 0.39% for HTAB.

HTAB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFIX and HTAB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer