PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFIX vs. DFCF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AFIX vs. DFCF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF (AFIX) and Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF (DFCF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFIX achieves a -0.53% return, which is significantly lower than DFCF's -0.42% return.


AFIX

1D
-0.39%
1M
-1.28%
6M
-0.90%
YTD
-0.53%
1Y
2.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.17%

DFCF

1D
-0.29%
1M
-1.24%
6M
-0.68%
YTD
-0.42%
1Y
2.24%
3Y*
4.66%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
0.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$424.05K$1.23M$562.83K
$59.72M$50.71M$53.37M

AFIX vs. DFCF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AFIX
Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF
-0.53%7.52%-1.56%
DFCF
Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF
-0.42%7.89%-1.82%

Correlation

The correlation between AFIX and DFCF is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2024

0.96

The correlation between AFIX and DFCF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFIX vs. DFCF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AFIX
AFIX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
AFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
AFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

DFCF
DFCF Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
DFCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFCF Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
DFCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFCF Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AFIX vs. DFCF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF (AFIX) and Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF (DFCF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AFIXDFCFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.13

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.95

1.08

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.39

2.76

-0.37

AFIX vs. DFCF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is comparable to the DFCF Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFIX and DFCF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AFIX vs. DFCF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFIX drawdown since its inception was -3.33%, smaller than the maximum DFCF drawdown of -19.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFIX and DFCF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFIXDFCFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.33%

-19.56%

+16.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.10%

-2.79%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.70%

-2.24%

-0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.04%

-7.81%

+6.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.23%

1.09%

+0.14%

Volatility

AFIX vs. DFCF - Volatility Comparison

Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF (AFIX) has a higher volatility of 1.19% compared to Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF (DFCF) at 1.08%. This indicates that AFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFCF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFIXDFCFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.19%

1.08%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.17%

3.15%

+0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.97%

3.95%

+0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.53%

6.40%

-1.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.53%

6.40%

-1.87%

AFIX vs. DFCF - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFIX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than DFCF's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AFIX vs. DFCF - Dividend Comparison

AFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.18%, more than DFCF's 4.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
AFIX
Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF
5.18%4.94%0.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DFCF
Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF
4.41%4.48%4.61%4.51%3.27%0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, AFIX and DFCF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AFIX has higher volatility (1.19%) compared to DFCF (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFIX dropped -3.33% vs DFCF's -19.56%.

On 1-year performance, DFCF leads with 2.24% vs 2.06% for AFIX. On fees, DFCF is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, DFCF has been the lower-risk option at 1.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DFCF has performed better with a 2.24% return vs 2.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFCF is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for AFIX.

AFIX has the higher dividend yield at 5.18%, compared with 4.41% for DFCF.

They also come from different issuers: Allspring and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for AFIX and 0.17% for DFCF.

DFCF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.76 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFIX and DFCF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer