PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFIX vs. CMDT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AFIX vs. CMDT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF (AFIX) and PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFIX achieves a 0.73% return, which is significantly lower than CMDT's 15.54% return.


AFIX

1D
0.30%
1M
0.90%
YTD
0.73%
6M
0.80%
1Y
5.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CMDT

1D
-0.25%
1M
-7.42%
YTD
15.54%
6M
17.31%
1Y
21.62%
3Y*
12.77%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFIX vs. CMDT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AFIX
Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF
0.73%7.52%-1.56%
CMDT
PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund
15.54%12.78%1.29%

Correlation

The correlation between AFIX and CMDT is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2024

-0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFIX vs. CMDT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFIX
AFIX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
AFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
AFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

CMDT
CMDT Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
CMDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMDT Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
CMDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMDT Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFIX vs. CMDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF (AFIX) and PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AFIXCMDTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.30

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.73

2.30

-0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.03

9.95

-4.91

AFIX vs. CMDT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the CMDT Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFIX and CMDT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AFIX vs. CMDT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFIX drawdown since its inception was -3.33%, smaller than the maximum CMDT drawdown of -9.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFIX and CMDT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFIXCMDTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.33%

-9.69%

+6.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.10%

-9.46%

+6.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.46%

-9.46%

+8.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.98%

-2.75%

+1.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.06%

2.19%

-1.13%

Volatility

AFIX vs. CMDT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF (AFIX) is 1.26%, while PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT) has a volatility of 3.30%. This indicates that AFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFIXCMDTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.26%

3.30%

-2.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.97%

10.50%

-7.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.93%

12.57%

-8.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.54%

12.23%

-7.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.54%

12.23%

-7.69%

AFIX vs. CMDT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFIX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CMDT's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

AFIX vs. CMDT - Dividend Comparison

AFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.00%, more than CMDT's 2.62% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
AFIX
Allspring Broad Market Core Bond ETF
5.00%4.94%0.38%0.00%
CMDT
PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund
2.62%3.04%8.80%2.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


AFIX and CMDT have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CMDT has higher volatility (3.30%) compared to AFIX (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFIX dropped -3.33% vs CMDT's -9.69%.

On 1-year performance, CMDT leads with 21.62% vs 5.26% for AFIX. On fees, AFIX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, AFIX has been the lower-risk option at 1.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CMDT has performed better with a 21.62% return vs 5.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AFIX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CMDT.

AFIX has the higher dividend yield at 5.00%, compared with 2.62% for CMDT.

AFIX is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while CMDT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Allspring and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for AFIX and 0.65% for CMDT.

CMDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFIX and CMDT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer