AFIF vs. ABI

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

AFIF (Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF) and ABI (VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Over the past year, AFIF returned 4.79% vs 5.27% for ABI. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AFIF charges 1.08%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ABI.

Performance

AFIF vs. ABI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF (AFIF) and VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF (ABI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFIF achieves a 1.93% return, which is significantly lower than ABI's 3.20% return.

AFIF

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.27%
• 6M: 1.57%
• YTD: 1.93%
• 1Y: 4.79%
• 3Y*: 7.18%
• 5Y*: 3.77%
• 10Y*: —

ABI

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.36%
• 6M: 2.73%
• YTD: 3.20%
• 1Y: 5.27%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFIF vs. ABI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AFIF Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF	1.93%	3.14%
ABI VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF	3.20%	2.05%

Correlation

The correlation between AFIF and ABI is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.19

Return for Risk

AFIF vs. ABI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFIF

AFIF Risk / Return Rank: 74
AFIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
AFIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
AFIF Omega Ratio Rank: 77
AFIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
AFIF Martin Ratio Rank: 83

ABI

ABI Risk / Return Rank: 96
ABI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
ABI Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
ABI Omega Ratio Rank: 98
ABI Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
ABI Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFIF vs. ABI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF (AFIF) and VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF (ABI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AFIF	ABI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.76	4.15	-2.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.54	6.31	-3.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	2.01	-0.65
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.95	5.57	-2.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.94	16.88	-3.94

AFIF vs. ABI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFIF Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is lower than the ABI Sharpe Ratio of 4.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFIF and ABI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AFIF vs. ABI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFIF drawdown since its inception was -10.29%, which is greater than ABI's maximum drawdown of -0.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFIF and ABI.

Drawdown Indicators

	AFIF	ABI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.29%	-0.95%	-9.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.63%	-0.95%	-0.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.79%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-8.82%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.11%	-0.04%	-0.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.19%	-0.17%	-2.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.37%	0.31%	+0.06%

Volatility

AFIF vs. ABI - Volatility Comparison

Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF (AFIF) has a higher volatility of 0.65% compared to VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF (ABI) at 0.35%. This indicates that AFIF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AFIF	ABI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.65%	0.35%	+0.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.04%	0.82%	+1.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.75%	1.28%	+1.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.38%	1.26%	+3.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.22%	1.26%	+4.96%

AFIF vs. ABI - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFIF has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than ABI's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

AFIF vs. ABI - Dividend Comparison

AFIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, less than ABI's 6.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ABI VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF	6.20%	3.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
AFIF Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF	3.72%	3.52%	5.61%	5.91%	3.49%	1.73%	1.25%	2.54%	0.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AFIF and ABI in my portfolio?

AFIF and ABI have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AFIF or ABI?

AFIF has higher volatility (0.65%) compared to ABI (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFIF dropped -10.29% vs ABI's -0.95%.

Which ETF is better, AFIF or ABI?

On 1-year performance, ABI leads with 5.27% vs 4.79% for AFIF. On fees, ABI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, ABI has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AFIF or ABI?

Over the 1-year period, ABI has performed better with a 5.27% return vs 4.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AFIF or ABI?

ABI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for AFIF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AFIF or ABI?

ABI has the higher dividend yield at 6.20%, compared with 3.72% for AFIF.

What is the main difference between AFIF and ABI?

They also come from different issuers: Regents Park Funds and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 1.08% for AFIF and 0.65% for ABI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ABI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.15 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.