AETH vs. BTRN
AETH (Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF) and BTRN (Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. AETH is actively managed, while BTRN is passively managed. Over the past year, AETH returned -16.05% vs -18.31% for BTRN. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AETH charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BTRN.
Performance
AETH vs. BTRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AETH achieves a -9.79% return, which is significantly lower than BTRN's -9.29% return.
AETH
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -4.98%
- YTD
- -9.79%
- 6M
- -15.30%
- 1Y
- -16.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTRN
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- -12.31%
- YTD
- -9.29%
- 6M
- -9.90%
- 1Y
- -18.31%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AETH vs. BTRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AETH Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF | -9.79% | -0.11% | -8.50% |
BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF | -9.29% | 4.89% | 5.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between AETH and BTRN is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2024 | 0.55 |
The correlation between AETH and BTRN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AETH vs. BTRN — Risk / Return Rank
AETH
BTRN
AETH vs. BTRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF (AETH) and Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AETH | BTRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 0.84 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | -0.73 | +0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.52 | -1.25 | +0.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AETH | BTRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.36 | -0.93 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.00 | +0.37 |
Drawdowns
AETH vs. BTRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AETH drawdown since its inception was -47.78%, which is greater than BTRN's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AETH and BTRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AETH | BTRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.78% | -36.97% | -10.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.98% | -25.29% | -18.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.85% | -25.29% | -18.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.65% | -14.41% | -10.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.86% | 14.68% | +16.18% |
Volatility
AETH vs. BTRN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF (AETH) is 4.02%, while Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN) has a volatility of 7.24%. This indicates that AETH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AETH | BTRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.02% | 7.24% | -3.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.18% | 10.35% | +16.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.03% | 19.91% | +25.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.68% | 30.96% | +23.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.68% | 30.96% | +23.72% |
AETH vs. BTRN - Expense Ratio Comparison
AETH has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than BTRN's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
AETH vs. BTRN - Dividend Comparison
AETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, less than BTRN's 30.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AETH Bitwise Ethereum Strategy ETF | 2.67% | 2.41% | 14.73% | 6.64% |
BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF | 30.60% | 27.76% | 2.56% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AETH and BTRN have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTRN has higher volatility (7.24%) compared to AETH (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AETH dropped -47.78% vs BTRN's -36.97%.
On 1-year performance, AETH leads with -16.05% vs -18.31% for BTRN. On fees, AETH is cheaper at 0.90% per year. On volatility, AETH has been the lower-risk option at 4.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AETH has performed better with a -16.05% return vs -18.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AETH is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BTRN.
BTRN has the higher dividend yield at 30.60%, compared with 2.67% for AETH.
They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for AETH and 0.95% for BTRN.
AETH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.36 vs -0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AETH and BTRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer