PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
AES vs. BINC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

AES vs. BINC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AES (The AES Corporation) is a stock, while BINC (iShares Flexible Income Active ETF) is Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by iShares. Over the past 3 years, AES returned -5.64%/yr vs 7.02%/yr for BINC. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

AES vs. BINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The AES Corporation (AES) and iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AES achieves a 5.07% return, which is significantly higher than BINC's 0.90% return.

AES

1D
0.20%
1M
3.01%
YTD
5.07%
6M
9.90%
1Y
50.59%
3Y*
-5.64%
5Y*
-6.44%
10Y*
6.68%

BINC

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.54%
YTD
0.90%
6M
1.22%
1Y
5.80%
3Y*
7.02%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AES vs. BINC - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023
AES
The AES Corporation		5.07%18.26%-30.40%-5.51%
BINC
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF		0.90%7.57%5.76%7.08%

Correlation

The correlation between AES and BINC is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2023

0.27

The correlation between AES and BINC shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

The AES Corporation

iShares Flexible Income Active ETF

Often compared with AES:
AES vs. AVAAES vs. ENPHAES vs. EGYAES vs. GDAES vs. XELAES vs. ICLNAES vs. ABT
Often compared with BINC:
BINC vs. JPIEBINC vs. PYLDBINC vs. BNDBINC vs. JAAABINC vs. JEPIBINC vs. PONAXBINC vs. AGG

Return for Risk

AES vs. BINC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
AES
AES Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
AES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AES Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
AES Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
AES Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
AES Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
BINC
BINC Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
BINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
BINC Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
BINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
BINC Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AES vs. BINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The AES Corporation (AES) and iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

AESBINCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.18
2.56

-1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.90
3.71

-1.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.51

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

2.17

+0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.12

8.53

-3.41

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AES vs. BINC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AES Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the BINC Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AES and BINC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

AESBINCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18

2.56

-1.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

2.36

-2.24

Drawdowns

AES vs. BINC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AES drawdown since its inception was -98.65%, which is greater than BINC's maximum drawdown of -2.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AES and BINC.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

AESBINCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.65%

-2.69%

-95.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.98%

-2.69%

-16.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.33%

-2.69%

-50.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.43%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.43%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.00%

-0.49%

-61.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.02%

-0.36%

-56.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.91%

0.68%

+9.23%

Volatility

AES vs. BINC - Volatility Comparison

The AES Corporation (AES) has a higher volatility of 1.51% compared to iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC) at 0.75%. This indicates that AES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

AESBINCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.51%

0.75%

+0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.70%

1.84%

+23.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.94%

2.28%

+40.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.83%

3.00%

+34.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.06%

3.00%

+33.06%

Dividends

AES vs. BINC - Dividend Comparison

AES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.78%, less than BINC's 5.86% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AES
The AES Corporation		4.78%4.91%5.36%3.45%2.20%2.48%2.44%2.74%3.60%4.43%3.79%4.18%
BINC
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF		5.86%5.86%6.14%3.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

AES and BINC have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AES has higher volatility (1.51%) compared to BINC (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AES dropped -98.65% vs BINC's -2.69%.

BINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AES and BINC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer