AEMS vs. PEPS
AEMS (Anfield Enhanced Market ETF) and PEPS (Parametric Equity Plus ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AEMS charges 1.21%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for PEPS.
Performance
AEMS vs. PEPS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AEMS achieves a 15.43% return, which is significantly higher than PEPS's 10.67% return.
AEMS
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 6.67%
- YTD
- 15.43%
- 6M
- 15.97%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PEPS
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 6.44%
- YTD
- 10.67%
- 6M
- 10.79%
- 1Y
- 31.83%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AEMS vs. PEPS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AEMS Anfield Enhanced Market ETF | 15.43% | 11.81% |
PEPS Parametric Equity Plus ETF | 10.67% | 14.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between AEMS and PEPS is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2025 | 0.92 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AEMS vs. PEPS — Risk / Return Rank
AEMS
PEPS
AEMS vs. PEPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anfield Enhanced Market ETF (AEMS) and Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AEMS | PEPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.98 | 1.05 | +0.93 |
Drawdowns
AEMS vs. PEPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AEMS drawdown since its inception was -11.37%, smaller than the maximum PEPS drawdown of -21.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEMS and PEPS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AEMS | PEPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.37% | -21.26% | +9.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.49% | -0.51% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.48% | -2.77% | +1.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.09% | — |
Volatility
AEMS vs. PEPS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AEMS | PEPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.77% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.83% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.14% | 13.06% | +3.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.14% | 18.31% | -2.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.14% | 18.31% | -2.17% |
AEMS vs. PEPS - Expense Ratio Comparison
AEMS has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than PEPS's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
AEMS vs. PEPS - Dividend Comparison
AEMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.53%, more than PEPS's 0.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AEMS Anfield Enhanced Market ETF | 6.53% | 7.53% | 0.00% |
PEPS Parametric Equity Plus ETF | 0.88% | 1.00% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, AEMS and PEPS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, PEPS is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PEPS is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.21% for AEMS.
AEMS has the higher dividend yield at 6.53%, compared with 0.88% for PEPS.
They also come from different issuers: Anfield and Parametric. Their fees differ too: 1.21% for AEMS and 0.10% for PEPS.
Find the right allocation for AEMS and PEPS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer