AEMS vs. OMAH
AEMS (Anfield Enhanced Market ETF) and OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AEMS charges 1.21%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OMAH.
Performance
AEMS vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AEMS achieves a 15.80% return, which is significantly higher than OMAH's 5.13% return.
AEMS
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 5.79%
- YTD
- 15.80%
- 6M
- 16.12%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OMAH
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 0.72%
- YTD
- 5.13%
- 6M
- 5.28%
- 1Y
- 12.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AEMS vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AEMS Anfield Enhanced Market ETF | 15.80% | 11.81% |
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF | 5.13% | 3.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between AEMS and OMAH is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2025 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AEMS vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank
AEMS
OMAH
AEMS vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anfield Enhanced Market ETF (AEMS) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AEMS | OMAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.00 | 0.74 | +1.27 |
Drawdowns
AEMS vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AEMS drawdown since its inception was -11.37%, roughly equal to the maximum OMAH drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEMS and OMAH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AEMS | OMAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.37% | -11.83% | +0.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | -2.12% | +1.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.48% | -1.26% | -0.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.22% | — |
Volatility
AEMS vs. OMAH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AEMS | OMAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.99% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.50% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.11% | 8.06% | +8.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.11% | 13.20% | +2.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.11% | 13.20% | +2.91% |
AEMS vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison
AEMS has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
AEMS vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison
AEMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.51%, less than OMAH's 15.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AEMS Anfield Enhanced Market ETF | 6.51% | 7.53% |
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF | 15.36% | 12.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AEMS and OMAH have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, OMAH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
OMAH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.21% for AEMS.
OMAH has the higher dividend yield at 15.36%, compared with 6.51% for AEMS.
They also come from different issuers: Anfield and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 1.21% for AEMS and 0.95% for OMAH.
Find the right allocation for AEMS and OMAH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer