AEMS vs. IVVW

Last updated Jul 3, 2026

AEMS (Anfield Enhanced Market ETF) and IVVW (iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Over the past year, AEMS returned 40.50% vs 17.39% for IVVW. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AEMS charges 1.21%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IVVW.

Performance

AEMS vs. IVVW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Anfield Enhanced Market ETF (AEMS) and iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AEMS achieves a 26.17% return, which is significantly higher than IVVW's 5.70% return.

AEMS

• 1D: 7.99%
• 1M: 8.77%
• 6M: 26.17%
• YTD: 26.17%
• 1Y: 40.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IVVW

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.80%
• 6M: 5.70%
• YTD: 5.70%
• 1Y: 17.39%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AEMS vs. IVVW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AEMS Anfield Enhanced Market ETF	26.17%	11.86%
IVVW iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF	5.70%	11.22%

Correlation

The correlation between AEMS and IVVW is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025	0.79

The correlation between AEMS and IVVW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AEMS vs. IVVW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AEMS

AEMS Risk / Return Rank: 85
AEMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
AEMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
AEMS Omega Ratio Rank: 84
AEMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
AEMS Martin Ratio Rank: 89

IVVW

IVVW Risk / Return Rank: 81
IVVW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
IVVW Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
IVVW Omega Ratio Rank: 89
IVVW Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
IVVW Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AEMS vs. IVVW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anfield Enhanced Market ETF (AEMS) and iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AEMS	IVVW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.16	2.16	0.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.17	2.96	+0.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.47	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.58	3.00	+0.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.08	15.95	+0.13

AEMS vs. IVVW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AEMS Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the IVVW Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AEMS and IVVW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AEMS vs. IVVW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AEMS drawdown since its inception was -11.37%, smaller than the maximum IVVW drawdown of -16.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEMS and IVVW.

Drawdown Indicators

	AEMS	IVVW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.37%	-16.79%	+5.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.37%	-5.81%	-5.56%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.02%	+0.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.49%	-1.72%	+0.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.53%	1.09%	+1.44%

Volatility

AEMS vs. IVVW - Volatility Comparison

Anfield Enhanced Market ETF (AEMS) has a higher volatility of 10.66% compared to iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW) at 3.61%. This indicates that AEMS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVVW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AEMS	IVVW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.66%	3.61%	+7.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.09%	6.98%	+9.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.82%	8.09%	+10.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.79%	12.64%	+6.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.79%	12.64%	+6.15%

AEMS vs. IVVW - Expense Ratio Comparison

AEMS has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than IVVW's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

AEMS vs. IVVW - Dividend Comparison

AEMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 407.25%, more than IVVW's 19.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
AEMS Anfield Enhanced Market ETF	407.25%	7.53%	0.00%
IVVW iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF	19.26%	18.55%	13.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AEMS and IVVW in my portfolio?

AEMS and IVVW have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AEMS or IVVW?

AEMS has higher volatility (10.66%) compared to IVVW (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AEMS dropped -11.37% vs IVVW's -16.79%.

Which ETF is better, AEMS or IVVW?

On 1-year performance, AEMS leads with 40.50% vs 17.39% for IVVW. On fees, IVVW is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IVVW has been the lower-risk option at 3.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AEMS or IVVW?

Over the 1-year period, AEMS has performed better with a 40.50% return vs 17.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AEMS or IVVW?

IVVW is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.21% for AEMS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AEMS or IVVW?

AEMS has the higher dividend yield at 407.25%, compared with 19.26% for IVVW.

What is the main difference between AEMS and IVVW?

They also come from different issuers: Anfield and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.21% for AEMS and 0.25% for IVVW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AEMS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.