AEMS vs. GPIX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

AEMS (Anfield Enhanced Market ETF) and GPIX (Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AEMS charges 1.21%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for GPIX.

Performance

AEMS vs. GPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Anfield Enhanced Market ETF (AEMS) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AEMS achieves a 12.16% return, which is significantly higher than GPIX's 7.91% return.

AEMS

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: -0.71%
• YTD: 12.16%
• 6M: 9.61%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GPIX

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: -0.85%
• YTD: 7.91%
• 6M: 6.94%
• 1Y: 20.92%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AEMS vs. GPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AEMS Anfield Enhanced Market ETF	12.16%	11.86%
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF	7.91%	10.59%

Correlation

The correlation between AEMS and GPIX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025	0.94

Return for Risk

AEMS vs. GPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AEMS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GPIX

GPIX Risk / Return Rank: 68
GPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
GPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
GPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
GPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
GPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AEMS vs. GPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anfield Enhanced Market ETF (AEMS) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AEMS	GPIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.95	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.68	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.37	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.73	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	13.20	—

Drawdowns

AEMS vs. GPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AEMS drawdown since its inception was -11.37%, smaller than the maximum GPIX drawdown of -17.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEMS and GPIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AEMS	GPIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.37%	-17.50%	+6.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.71%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.31%	-2.29%	-1.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.53%	-1.48%	-0.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.59%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AEMS	GPIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.24%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.71%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.88%	10.79%	+6.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.88%	13.88%	+3.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.88%	13.88%	+3.00%

AEMS vs. GPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AEMS has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than GPIX's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

AEMS vs. GPIX - Dividend Comparison

AEMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.72%, less than GPIX's 8.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AEMS Anfield Enhanced Market ETF	6.72%	7.53%	0.00%	0.00%
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF	8.14%	8.01%	7.45%	1.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AEMS and GPIX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, AEMS and GPIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, AEMS or GPIX?

On fees, GPIX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AEMS or GPIX?

GPIX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.21% for AEMS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AEMS or GPIX?

GPIX has the higher dividend yield at 8.14%, compared with 6.72% for AEMS.

What is the main difference between AEMS and GPIX?

They also come from different issuers: Anfield and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 1.21% for AEMS and 0.29% for GPIX.