AEMS vs. FTQI

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

AEMS (Anfield Enhanced Market ETF) and FTQI (First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AEMS is a Derivative Income fund managed by Anfield, while FTQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AEMS charges 1.21%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FTQI.

Performance

AEMS vs. FTQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Anfield Enhanced Market ETF (AEMS) and First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AEMS achieves a 12.16% return, which is significantly higher than FTQI's 10.72% return.

AEMS

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: -0.71%
• YTD: 12.16%
• 6M: 9.61%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FTQI

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.53%
• YTD: 10.72%
• 6M: 9.99%
• 1Y: 26.22%
• 3Y*: 16.88%
• 5Y*: 10.94%
• 10Y*: 8.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AEMS vs. FTQI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AEMS Anfield Enhanced Market ETF	12.16%	11.86%
FTQI First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF	10.72%	12.90%

Correlation

The correlation between AEMS and FTQI is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025	0.86

Return for Risk

AEMS vs. FTQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AEMS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FTQI

FTQI Risk / Return Rank: 87
FTQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
FTQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
FTQI Omega Ratio Rank: 86
FTQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
FTQI Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AEMS vs. FTQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anfield Enhanced Market ETF (AEMS) and First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AEMS	FTQI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.48	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.41	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.47	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.22	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	20.11	—

Drawdowns

AEMS vs. FTQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AEMS drawdown since its inception was -11.37%, smaller than the maximum FTQI drawdown of -19.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEMS and FTQI.

Drawdown Indicators

	AEMS	FTQI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.37%	-19.42%	+8.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.24%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.42%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.42%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-19.42%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.31%	-0.90%	-2.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.53%	-3.74%	+2.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.31%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AEMS	FTQI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.26%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.52%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.88%	10.64%	+6.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.88%	14.83%	+2.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.88%	13.33%	+3.55%

AEMS vs. FTQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

AEMS has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than FTQI's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

AEMS vs. FTQI - Dividend Comparison

AEMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.72%, less than FTQI's 10.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AEMS Anfield Enhanced Market ETF	6.72%	7.53%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FTQI First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF	10.97%	11.46%	11.66%	11.49%	9.85%	3.05%	3.27%	2.95%	3.27%	2.74%	3.02%	3.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AEMS and FTQI in my portfolio?

AEMS and FTQI have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AEMS or FTQI?

On fees, FTQI is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AEMS or FTQI?

FTQI is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.21% for AEMS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AEMS or FTQI?

FTQI has the higher dividend yield at 10.97%, compared with 6.72% for AEMS.

What is the main difference between AEMS and FTQI?

AEMS is categorized as Derivative Income, while FTQI is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Anfield and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.21% for AEMS and 0.75% for FTQI.