AEMS vs. ARMW

Last updated Jul 3, 2026

AEMS (Anfield Enhanced Market ETF) and ARMW (Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AEMS charges 1.21%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for ARMW.

Performance

AEMS vs. ARMW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Anfield Enhanced Market ETF (AEMS) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AEMS achieves a 26.17% return, which is significantly lower than ARMW's 228.85% return.

AEMS

• 1D: 7.99%
• 1M: 8.77%
• 6M: 26.17%
• YTD: 26.17%
• 1Y: 40.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ARMW

• 1D: -8.74%
• 1M: -26.57%
• 6M: 228.85%
• YTD: 228.85%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AEMS vs. ARMW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AEMS Anfield Enhanced Market ETF	26.17%	3.06%
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF	228.85%	-41.28%

Correlation

The correlation between AEMS and ARMW is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025	0.53

Return for Risk

AEMS vs. ARMW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AEMS

AEMS Risk / Return Rank: 85
AEMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
AEMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
AEMS Omega Ratio Rank: 84
AEMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
AEMS Martin Ratio Rank: 89

ARMW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AEMS vs. ARMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anfield Enhanced Market ETF (AEMS) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AEMS	ARMW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.16	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.17	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.58	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.08	—	—

Drawdowns

AEMS vs. ARMW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AEMS drawdown since its inception was -11.37%, smaller than the maximum ARMW drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEMS and ARMW.

Drawdown Indicators

	AEMS	ARMW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.37%	-48.47%	+37.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.37%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-33.82%	+33.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.49%	-25.34%	+23.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.53%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AEMS	ARMW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.66%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.09%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.82%	94.35%	-75.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.79%	94.35%	-75.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.79%	94.35%	-75.56%

AEMS vs. ARMW - Expense Ratio Comparison

AEMS has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

AEMS vs. ARMW - Dividend Comparison

AEMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 407.25%, more than ARMW's 36.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
AEMS Anfield Enhanced Market ETF	407.25%	7.53%
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF	36.90%	16.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AEMS and ARMW in my portfolio?

AEMS and ARMW have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AEMS or ARMW?

On fees, ARMW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AEMS or ARMW?

ARMW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.21% for AEMS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AEMS or ARMW?

AEMS has the higher dividend yield at 407.25%, compared with 36.90% for ARMW.

What is the main difference between AEMS and ARMW?

They also come from different issuers: Anfield and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 1.21% for AEMS and 0.99% for ARMW.