AEMGX vs. LZEMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Acadian Emerging Markets Portfolio (AEMGX) and Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX).
AEMGX is managed by Acadian Funds. It was launched on Jun 16, 1993. LZEMX is managed by Lazard. It was launched on Jul 14, 1994.
Performance
AEMGX vs. LZEMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AEMGX vs. LZEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AEMGX Acadian Emerging Markets Portfolio | 3.14% | 27.51% | 13.91% | 22.67% | -20.09% | 6.96% | 10.35% | 18.01% | -18.67% | 37.64% |
LZEMX Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio | 6.61% | 41.35% | 7.60% | 22.44% | -14.86% | 5.37% | -0.07% | 18.06% | -18.11% | 28.02% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AEMGX achieves a 3.14% return, which is significantly lower than LZEMX's 6.61% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with AEMGX having a 9.57% annualized return and LZEMX not far behind at 9.39%.
AEMGX
- 1D
- 2.73%
- 1M
- -10.07%
- YTD
- 3.14%
- 6M
- 6.83%
- 1Y
- 29.23%
- 3Y*
- 19.84%
- 5Y*
- 7.77%
- 10Y*
- 9.57%
LZEMX
- 1D
- 1.54%
- 1M
- -7.29%
- YTD
- 6.61%
- 6M
- 16.90%
- 1Y
- 40.50%
- 3Y*
- 22.54%
- 5Y*
- 11.01%
- 10Y*
- 9.39%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AEMGX vs. LZEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AEMGX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than LZEMX's 1.06% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AEMGX vs. LZEMX — Risk / Return Rank
AEMGX
LZEMX
AEMGX vs. LZEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acadian Emerging Markets Portfolio (AEMGX) and Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AEMGX | LZEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.68 | 2.95 | -1.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.19 | 3.72 | -1.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.57 | -0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | 3.86 | -1.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.13 | 14.21 | -6.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AEMGX | LZEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.68 | 2.95 | -1.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.78 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.39 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between AEMGX and LZEMX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AEMGX vs. LZEMX - Dividend Comparison
AEMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.17%, more than LZEMX's 1.92% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AEMGX Acadian Emerging Markets Portfolio | 4.17% | 4.30% | 3.38% | 3.85% | 7.27% | 3.15% | 1.29% | 1.79% | 1.83% | 1.30% | 2.01% | 1.27% |
LZEMX Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio | 1.92% | 2.05% | 3.11% | 3.76% | 5.92% | 4.89% | 2.11% | 2.45% | 2.10% | 1.99% | 1.48% | 2.14% |
Drawdowns
AEMGX vs. LZEMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AEMGX drawdown since its inception was -70.30%, which is greater than LZEMX's maximum drawdown of -60.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEMGX and LZEMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AEMGX | LZEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.30% | -60.08% | -10.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.19% | -10.42% | -3.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.24% | -30.55% | -3.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.36% | -44.08% | +2.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.85% | -9.04% | -2.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.20% | -16.71% | -2.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.62% | 2.89% | +0.73% |
Volatility
AEMGX vs. LZEMX - Volatility Comparison
Acadian Emerging Markets Portfolio (AEMGX) has a higher volatility of 9.10% compared to Lazard Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (LZEMX) at 6.23%. This indicates that AEMGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LZEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AEMGX | LZEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.10% | 6.23% | +2.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.62% | 9.72% | +3.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.97% | 14.30% | +3.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.64% | 14.11% | +1.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.76% | 16.34% | +0.42% |