PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
AEMGX vs. TRLGX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


AEMGXTRLGX
YTD Return6.80%9.35%
1Y Return22.84%38.22%
3Y Return (Ann)0.69%4.94%
5Y Return (Ann)5.72%14.94%
10Y Return (Ann)4.29%15.69%
Sharpe Ratio1.832.43
Daily Std Dev12.34%15.57%
Max Drawdown-70.30%-55.56%
Current Drawdown-1.53%-3.76%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between AEMGX and TRLGX is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

AEMGX vs. TRLGX - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, AEMGX achieves a 6.80% return, which is significantly lower than TRLGX's 9.35% return. Over the past 10 years, AEMGX has underperformed TRLGX with an annualized return of 4.29%, while TRLGX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.69% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


600.00%700.00%800.00%900.00%1,000.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
747.08%
987.23%
AEMGX
TRLGX

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Acadian Emerging Markets Portfolio

T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund

AEMGX vs. TRLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AEMGX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than TRLGX's 0.55% expense ratio.


AEMGX
Acadian Emerging Markets Portfolio
Expense ratio chart for AEMGX: current value at 1.49% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.49%
Expense ratio chart for TRLGX: current value at 0.55% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.55%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

AEMGX vs. TRLGX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acadian Emerging Markets Portfolio (AEMGX) and T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AEMGX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AEMGX, currently valued at 1.83, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.83
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for AEMGX, currently valued at 2.65, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.002.65
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for AEMGX, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.32
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for AEMGX, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.12
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for AEMGX, currently valued at 7.28, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0040.0050.0060.007.28
TRLGX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for TRLGX, currently valued at 2.43, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.002.43
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for TRLGX, currently valued at 3.37, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.003.37
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for TRLGX, currently valued at 1.42, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.42
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for TRLGX, currently valued at 1.27, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.27
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for TRLGX, currently valued at 15.38, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0040.0050.0060.0015.38

AEMGX vs. TRLGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AEMGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which roughly equals the TRLGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of AEMGX and TRLGX.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1.83
2.43
AEMGX
TRLGX

Dividends

AEMGX vs. TRLGX - Dividend Comparison

AEMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, more than TRLGX's 1.86% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
AEMGX
Acadian Emerging Markets Portfolio
3.60%3.85%7.27%3.15%1.29%1.79%1.83%1.30%2.01%1.27%1.16%1.15%
TRLGX
T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund
1.86%2.04%3.88%2.56%0.42%7.76%7.93%9.27%1.64%4.71%7.64%0.04%

Drawdowns

AEMGX vs. TRLGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AEMGX drawdown since its inception was -70.30%, which is greater than TRLGX's maximum drawdown of -55.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEMGX and TRLGX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-1.53%
-3.76%
AEMGX
TRLGX

Volatility

AEMGX vs. TRLGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Acadian Emerging Markets Portfolio (AEMGX) is 4.16%, while T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX) has a volatility of 5.42%. This indicates that AEMGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%3.50%4.00%4.50%5.00%5.50%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
4.16%
5.42%
AEMGX
TRLGX