PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
AEMGX vs. TRLGX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between AEMGX and TRLGX is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.6

Performance

AEMGX vs. TRLGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Acadian Emerging Markets Portfolio (AEMGX) and T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
4.03%
6.12%
AEMGX
TRLGX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AEMGX:

1.17

TRLGX:

1.14

Sortino Ratio

AEMGX:

1.61

TRLGX:

1.59

Omega Ratio

AEMGX:

1.21

TRLGX:

1.21

Calmar Ratio

AEMGX:

0.51

TRLGX:

1.55

Martin Ratio

AEMGX:

4.19

TRLGX:

4.98

Ulcer Index

AEMGX:

3.74%

TRLGX:

3.81%

Daily Std Dev

AEMGX:

13.45%

TRLGX:

16.67%

Max Drawdown

AEMGX:

-81.31%

TRLGX:

-56.16%

Current Drawdown

AEMGX:

-19.54%

TRLGX:

-5.32%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AEMGX achieves a 4.89% return, which is significantly higher than TRLGX's 3.61% return. Over the past 10 years, AEMGX has underperformed TRLGX with an annualized return of 5.07%, while TRLGX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.44% annualized return.


AEMGX

YTD

4.89%

1M

4.62%

6M

4.03%

1Y

15.48%

5Y*

7.09%

10Y*

5.07%

TRLGX

YTD

3.61%

1M

1.68%

6M

6.13%

1Y

20.29%

5Y*

12.59%

10Y*

11.44%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AEMGX vs. TRLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AEMGX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than TRLGX's 0.55% expense ratio.


AEMGX
Acadian Emerging Markets Portfolio
Expense ratio chart for AEMGX: current value at 1.49% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.49%
Expense ratio chart for TRLGX: current value at 0.55% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.55%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

AEMGX vs. TRLGX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AEMGX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AEMGX is 5555
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AEMGX is 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AEMGX is 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AEMGX is 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AEMGX is 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AEMGX is 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

TRLGX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TRLGX is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TRLGX is 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TRLGX is 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TRLGX is 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TRLGX is 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TRLGX is 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AEMGX vs. TRLGX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acadian Emerging Markets Portfolio (AEMGX) and T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AEMGX, currently valued at 1.17, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.171.14
The chart of Sortino ratio for AEMGX, currently valued at 1.61, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.611.59
The chart of Omega ratio for AEMGX, currently valued at 1.21, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.211.21
The chart of Calmar ratio for AEMGX, currently valued at 0.51, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.511.55
The chart of Martin ratio for AEMGX, currently valued at 4.19, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.004.194.98
AEMGX
TRLGX

The current AEMGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is comparable to the TRLGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AEMGX and TRLGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.17
1.14
AEMGX
TRLGX

Dividends

AEMGX vs. TRLGX - Dividend Comparison

AEMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, while TRLGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
AEMGX
Acadian Emerging Markets Portfolio
2.69%2.82%3.85%6.16%2.99%1.29%1.78%1.82%1.30%2.01%1.27%1.16%
TRLGX
T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.41%0.28%0.24%0.24%0.03%0.07%

Drawdowns

AEMGX vs. TRLGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AEMGX drawdown since its inception was -81.31%, which is greater than TRLGX's maximum drawdown of -56.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEMGX and TRLGX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-19.54%
-5.32%
AEMGX
TRLGX

Volatility

AEMGX vs. TRLGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Acadian Emerging Markets Portfolio (AEMGX) is 3.64%, while T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX) has a volatility of 4.10%. This indicates that AEMGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
3.64%
4.10%
AEMGX
TRLGX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab