AEM.TO vs. POU.TO
AEM.TO (Agnico Eagle Mines Limited) and POU.TO (Paramount Resources Ltd.) are both stocks. AEM.TO operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while POU.TO operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy). Over the past 10 years, AEM.TO returned 15.41%/yr vs 17.14%/yr for POU.TO. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AEM.TO vs. POU.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AEM.TO achieves a -1.88% return, which is significantly lower than POU.TO's 23.00% return. Over the past 10 years, AEM.TO has underperformed POU.TO with an annualized return of 15.41%, while POU.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 17.14% annualized return.
AEM.TO
- 1D
- 3.40%
- 1M
- -8.01%
- YTD
- -1.88%
- 6M
- -1.40%
- 1Y
- 35.72%
- 3Y*
- 53.43%
- 5Y*
- 24.09%
- 10Y*
- 15.41%
POU.TO
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- -8.05%
- YTD
- 23.00%
- 6M
- 18.31%
- 1Y
- 37.47%
- 3Y*
- 4.30%
- 5Y*
- 21.00%
- 10Y*
- 17.14%
AEM.TO vs. POU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AEM.TO Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | -1.88% | 109.63% | 58.54% | 6.65% | 8.01% | -23.56% | 13.64% | 46.58% | -4.22% | 3.57% |
POU.TO Paramount Resources Ltd. | 23.00% | -21.48% | 30.17% | -4.83% | 21.05% | 396.81% | -33.69% | 5.01% | -63.03% | 22.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between AEM.TO and POU.TO is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006 | 0.12 |
The correlation between AEM.TO and POU.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AEM.TO:
CA$114.10B
POU.TO:
CA$4.35B
AEM.TO:
$10.65
POU.TO:
CA$0.37
AEM.TO:
15.27
POU.TO:
80.47
AEM.TO:
0.23
POU.TO:
0.80
AEM.TO:
6.03
POU.TO:
4.74
AEM.TO:
3.11
POU.TO:
1.58
AEM.TO:
$13.56B
POU.TO:
CA$902.30M
AEM.TO:
$8.26B
POU.TO:
CA$181.10M
AEM.TO:
$9.54B
POU.TO:
CA$329.30M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AEM.TO vs. POU.TO — Risk / Return Rank
AEM.TO
POU.TO
AEM.TO vs. POU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM.TO) and Paramount Resources Ltd. (POU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AEM.TO | POU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.25 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | 2.27 | -1.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.79 | 5.78 | -2.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AEM.TO vs. POU.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AEM.TO drawdown since its inception was -70.33%, smaller than the maximum POU.TO drawdown of -98.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEM.TO and POU.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AEM.TO | POU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.33% | -98.31% | +27.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.24% | -18.11% | -20.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.24% | -53.34% | +15.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.24% | -56.46% | +16.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.07% | -96.12% | +41.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.88% | -37.16% | +3.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.18% | -54.12% | +24.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.73% | 7.11% | +6.62% |
Volatility
AEM.TO vs. POU.TO - Volatility Comparison
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM.TO) has a higher volatility of 15.84% compared to Paramount Resources Ltd. (POU.TO) at 10.34%. This indicates that AEM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than POU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AEM.TO | POU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.84% | 10.34% | +5.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.38% | 24.14% | +11.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.51% | 30.56% | +12.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.15% | 45.18% | -10.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.00% | 57.44% | -21.44% |
Dividends
AEM.TO vs. POU.TO - Dividend Comparison
AEM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than POU.TO's 2.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AEM.TO Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | 1.03% | 0.97% | 1.95% | 2.98% | 2.81% | 2.08% | 1.34% | 0.81% | 0.80% | 0.77% | 0.75% | 0.95% |
POU.TO Paramount Resources Ltd. | 2.04% | 2.89% | 5.34% | 5.78% | 3.95% | 0.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
AEM.TO vs. POU.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Agnico Eagle Mines Limited and Paramount Resources Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AEM.TO vs. POU.TO - Profitability Comparison
AEM.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a gross profit of 2.72B and revenue of 4.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.4%.
POU.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Paramount Resources Ltd. reported a gross profit of 60.10M and revenue of 280.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.4%.
AEM.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported an operating income of 2.56B and revenue of 4.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 62.4%.
POU.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Paramount Resources Ltd. reported an operating income of 40.10M and revenue of 280.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 14.3%.
AEM.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a net income of 1.70B and revenue of 4.10B, resulting in a net margin of 41.4%.
POU.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Paramount Resources Ltd. reported a net income of 53.20M and revenue of 280.40M, resulting in a net margin of 19.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AEM.TO and POU.TO have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for AEM.TO and POU.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer