PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
AEM.TO vs. GOLD.TO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


AEM.TOGOLD.TO
YTD Return23.60%-12.31%
1Y Return16.26%-20.28%
3Y Return (Ann)5.91%-17.42%
5Y Return (Ann)12.79%6.08%
10Y Return (Ann)11.72%1.85%
Sharpe Ratio0.60-0.53
Daily Std Dev26.84%37.04%
Max Drawdown-84.27%-76.83%
Current Drawdown-13.44%-69.92%

Fundamentals


AEM.TOGOLD.TO
Market CapCA$44.62BCA$214.45M
EPSCA$5.42-CA$0.17
PE Ratio16.5221.77
PEG Ratio28.263.66
Revenue (TTM)CA$6.63BCA$0.00
Gross Profit (TTM)CA$3.10BCA$0.00
EBITDA (TTM)CA$3.25B-CA$21.33M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between AEM.TO and GOLD.TO is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

AEM.TO vs. GOLD.TO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, AEM.TO achieves a 23.60% return, which is significantly higher than GOLD.TO's -12.31% return. Over the past 10 years, AEM.TO has outperformed GOLD.TO with an annualized return of 11.72%, while GOLD.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 1.85% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
32.98%
-22.56%
AEM.TO
GOLD.TO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Agnico Eagle Mines Limited

GoldMining Inc.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

AEM.TO vs. GOLD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM.TO) and GoldMining Inc. (GOLD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AEM.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AEM.TO, currently valued at 0.54, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.54
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for AEM.TO, currently valued at 0.96, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.96
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for AEM.TO, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.11
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for AEM.TO, currently valued at 0.35, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.35
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for AEM.TO, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.001.03
GOLD.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GOLD.TO, currently valued at -0.52, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.00-0.52
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GOLD.TO, currently valued at -0.58, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.58
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GOLD.TO, currently valued at 0.94, compared to the broader market0.501.001.500.94
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GOLD.TO, currently valued at -0.27, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.27
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GOLD.TO, currently valued at -0.95, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.95

AEM.TO vs. GOLD.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AEM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is higher than the GOLD.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.53. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of AEM.TO and GOLD.TO.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.00December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.54
-0.52
AEM.TO
GOLD.TO

Dividends

AEM.TO vs. GOLD.TO - Dividend Comparison

AEM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, while GOLD.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
AEM.TO
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited
1.80%2.20%2.27%2.71%1.06%0.69%0.80%0.71%0.82%0.88%1.42%3.97%
GOLD.TO
GoldMining Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

AEM.TO vs. GOLD.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AEM.TO drawdown since its inception was -84.27%, which is greater than GOLD.TO's maximum drawdown of -76.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEM.TO and GOLD.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-16.57%
-71.26%
AEM.TO
GOLD.TO

Volatility

AEM.TO vs. GOLD.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM.TO) is 7.49%, while GoldMining Inc. (GOLD.TO) has a volatility of 10.06%. This indicates that AEM.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOLD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
7.49%
10.06%
AEM.TO
GOLD.TO

Financials

AEM.TO vs. GOLD.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Agnico Eagle Mines Limited and GoldMining Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in CAD except per share items