AEM.TO vs. FNV.TO
AEM.TO (Agnico Eagle Mines Limited) and FNV.TO (Franco-Nevada Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Gold industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past 10 years, AEM.TO returned 14.82%/yr vs 13.50%/yr for FNV.TO. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
AEM.TO vs. FNV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AEM.TO achieves a -1.83% return, which is significantly lower than FNV.TO's 7.16% return. Over the past 10 years, AEM.TO has outperformed FNV.TO with an annualized return of 14.82%, while FNV.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 13.50% annualized return.
AEM.TO
- 1D
- -3.71%
- 1M
- -6.12%
- YTD
- -1.83%
- 6M
- -8.00%
- 1Y
- 36.63%
- 3Y*
- 54.89%
- 5Y*
- 27.03%
- 10Y*
- 14.82%
FNV.TO
- 1D
- -2.87%
- 1M
- -2.47%
- YTD
- 7.16%
- 6M
- 3.15%
- 1Y
- 33.19%
- 3Y*
- 19.47%
- 5Y*
- 12.21%
- 10Y*
- 13.50%
AEM.TO vs. FNV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AEM.TO Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | -1.83% | 109.63% | 58.54% | 6.65% | 8.01% | -23.56% | 13.64% | 46.58% | -4.22% | 3.57% |
FNV.TO Franco-Nevada Corporation | 7.16% | 69.89% | 16.50% | -19.65% | 6.38% | 10.37% | 19.99% | 41.29% | -3.60% | 26.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between AEM.TO and FNV.TO is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2007 | 0.71 |
The correlation between AEM.TO and FNV.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (all time) to 0.83 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AEM.TO:
CA$114.15B
FNV.TO:
CA$58.68B
AEM.TO:
$10.65
FNV.TO:
$7.09
AEM.TO:
15.08
FNV.TO:
30.23
AEM.TO:
0.22
FNV.TO:
0.63
AEM.TO:
5.95
FNV.TO:
19.69
AEM.TO:
3.07
FNV.TO:
5.11
AEM.TO:
$13.56B
FNV.TO:
$2.10B
AEM.TO:
$8.26B
FNV.TO:
$1.61B
AEM.TO:
$9.54B
FNV.TO:
$1.96B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AEM.TO vs. FNV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
AEM.TO
FNV.TO
AEM.TO vs. FNV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM.TO) and Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AEM.TO | FNV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.18 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | 1.38 | -0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.51 | 3.26 | -0.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AEM.TO vs. FNV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AEM.TO drawdown since its inception was -70.33%, which is greater than FNV.TO's maximum drawdown of -47.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEM.TO and FNV.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AEM.TO | FNV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.33% | -47.77% | -22.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.24% | -24.10% | -14.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.24% | -27.39% | -10.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.24% | -33.81% | -6.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.07% | -38.28% | -16.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.85% | -20.55% | -13.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.22% | -12.27% | -16.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.66% | 10.27% | +4.39% |
Volatility
AEM.TO vs. FNV.TO - Volatility Comparison
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM.TO) has a higher volatility of 15.65% compared to Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV.TO) at 13.90%. This indicates that AEM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AEM.TO | FNV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.65% | 13.90% | +1.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.97% | 30.24% | +5.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.26% | 36.12% | +8.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.25% | 28.66% | +6.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.02% | 28.80% | +7.22% |
Dividends
AEM.TO vs. FNV.TO - Dividend Comparison
AEM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than FNV.TO's 0.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AEM.TO Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | 1.03% | 0.97% | 1.95% | 2.98% | 2.81% | 2.08% | 1.34% | 0.81% | 0.80% | 0.77% | 0.75% | 0.95% |
FNV.TO Franco-Nevada Corporation | 0.75% | 0.74% | 1.17% | 1.25% | 0.81% | 0.66% | 0.86% | 0.74% | 1.07% | 0.98% | 1.08% | 1.42% |
Financials
AEM.TO vs. FNV.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Agnico Eagle Mines Limited and Franco-Nevada Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AEM.TO vs. FNV.TO - Profitability Comparison
AEM.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a gross profit of 2.72B and revenue of 4.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.4%.
FNV.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Franco-Nevada Corporation reported a gross profit of 517.08M and revenue of 639.45M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 80.9%.
AEM.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported an operating income of 2.56B and revenue of 4.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 62.4%.
FNV.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Franco-Nevada Corporation reported an operating income of 501.94M and revenue of 639.45M, resulting in an operating margin of 78.5%.
AEM.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a net income of 1.70B and revenue of 4.10B, resulting in a net margin of 41.4%.
FNV.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Franco-Nevada Corporation reported a net income of 460.92M and revenue of 639.45M, resulting in a net margin of 72.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AEM.TO and FNV.TO have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for AEM.TO and FNV.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer