PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ADVE vs. EMMF
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ADVE vs. EMMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF (ADVE) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ADVE vs. EMMF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ADVE
Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF
6.57%26.12%7.02%5.13%
EMMF
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund
5.23%21.22%9.45%7.35%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADVE achieves a 6.57% return, which is significantly higher than EMMF's 5.23% return.


ADVE

1D
3.40%
1M
-7.71%
YTD
6.57%
6M
10.65%
1Y
32.51%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EMMF

1D
3.29%
1M
-7.68%
YTD
5.23%
6M
9.36%
1Y
27.88%
3Y*
17.64%
5Y*
7.45%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ADVE vs. EMMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

ADVE has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than EMMF's 0.48% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ADVE vs. EMMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADVE
ADVE Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
ADVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADVE Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
ADVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADVE Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

EMMF
EMMF Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
EMMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMMF Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
EMMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMMF Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADVE vs. EMMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF (ADVE) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ADVEEMMFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.86

1.66

+0.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.51

2.25

+0.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.34

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

2.58

+0.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.93

10.52

+0.42

ADVE vs. EMMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADVE Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the EMMF Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADVE and EMMF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ADVEEMMFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86

1.66

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.19

0.39

+0.80

Correlation

The correlation between ADVE and EMMF is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

ADVE vs. EMMF - Dividend Comparison

ADVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, more than EMMF's 2.25% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
ADVE
Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF
2.80%2.97%6.00%0.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EMMF
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund
2.25%2.45%1.30%1.62%3.48%2.64%1.93%2.93%0.66%

Drawdowns

ADVE vs. EMMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADVE drawdown since its inception was -18.41%, smaller than the maximum EMMF drawdown of -32.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADVE and EMMF.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ADVEEMMFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.41%

-32.57%

+14.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.73%

-10.62%

-1.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.73%

-7.68%

-1.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.20%

-7.58%

+4.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

2.61%

+0.34%

Volatility

ADVE vs. EMMF - Volatility Comparison

Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF (ADVE) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF) have volatilities of 8.77% and 9.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ADVEEMMFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.77%

9.11%

-0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.93%

12.48%

+0.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.59%

16.91%

+0.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.11%

14.01%

+1.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.11%

16.45%

-1.34%