PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ADVE vs. EEMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ADVE vs. EEMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF (ADVE) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADVE achieves a 22.27% return, which is significantly higher than EEMV's 18.97% return.


ADVE

1D
1.38%
1M
5.22%
YTD
22.27%
6M
24.39%
1Y
42.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EEMV

1D
-0.04%
1M
7.57%
YTD
18.97%
6M
20.18%
1Y
27.98%
3Y*
14.53%
5Y*
5.94%
10Y*
6.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ADVE vs. EEMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ADVE
Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF
22.27%26.12%7.02%5.13%
EEMV
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF
18.97%13.45%7.98%5.24%

Correlation

The correlation between ADVE and EEMV is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2023

0.82

The correlation between ADVE and EEMV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

ADVE vs. EEMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ADVE
EEMV

Technology

29.0%
28.9%

Financial Services

27.3%
17.7%

Industrials

13.6%
6.7%

Communication Services

9.5%
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

6.9%
5.0%

Real Estate

4.0%
0.5%

Basic Materials

3.4%
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

2.9%
6.8%

Energy

1.2%
3.4%

Utilities

1.1%
4.6%

Healthcare

1.1%
6.2%

Technology

ADVE
29.0%
EEMV
28.9%

Financial Services

ADVE
27.3%
EEMV
17.7%

Industrials

ADVE
13.6%
EEMV
6.7%

Communication Services

ADVE
9.5%
EEMV
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

ADVE
6.9%
EEMV
5.0%

Real Estate

ADVE
4.0%
EEMV
0.5%

Basic Materials

ADVE
3.4%
EEMV
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

ADVE
2.9%
EEMV
6.8%

Energy

ADVE
1.2%
EEMV
3.4%

Utilities

ADVE
1.1%
EEMV
4.6%

Healthcare

ADVE
1.1%
EEMV
6.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ADVE vs. EEMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADVE
ADVE Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
ADVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADVE Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
ADVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADVE Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

EEMV
EEMV Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
EEMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEMV Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
EEMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEMV Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADVE vs. EEMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF (ADVE) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ADVEEEMVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.52

2.16

+0.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.50

3.04

+0.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.43

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.71

3.09

+0.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.74

11.54

+3.20

ADVE vs. EEMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADVE Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is comparable to the EEMV Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADVE and EEMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ADVEEEMVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

2.16

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.46

0.40

+1.06

Drawdowns

ADVE vs. EEMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADVE drawdown since its inception was -18.41%, smaller than the maximum EEMV drawdown of -31.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADVE and EEMV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ADVEEEMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.41%

-31.56%

+13.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.73%

-9.22%

-2.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.04%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.15%

-7.98%

+4.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

2.47%

+0.48%

Volatility

ADVE vs. EEMV - Volatility Comparison

Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF (ADVE) has a higher volatility of 5.98% compared to iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) at 5.67%. This indicates that ADVE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EEMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ADVEEEMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.98%

5.67%

+0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.40%

11.65%

+2.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.88%

13.02%

+3.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.69%

11.85%

+3.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.69%

13.86%

+1.83%

ADVE vs. EEMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ADVE has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than EEMV's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

ADVE vs. EEMV - Dividend Comparison

ADVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, more than EEMV's 2.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ADVE
Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF
2.44%2.97%6.00%0.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EEMV
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF
2.23%2.65%3.50%2.75%1.93%2.14%2.45%2.63%2.46%2.34%2.79%2.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


ADVE and EEMV have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ADVE has higher volatility (5.98%) compared to EEMV (5.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADVE dropped -18.41% vs EEMV's -31.56%.

On 1-year performance, ADVE leads with 42.25% vs 27.98% for EEMV. On fees, EEMV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, EEMV has been the lower-risk option at 5.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ADVE has performed better with a 42.25% return vs 27.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EEMV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ADVE.

ADVE has the higher dividend yield at 2.44%, compared with 2.23% for EEMV.

They also come from different issuers: Matthews and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for ADVE and 0.25% for EEMV.

ADVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ADVE and EEMV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer