ADVDX vs. LVAFX
ADVDX (abrdn Dynamic Dividend Fund) and LVAFX (LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, ADVDX returned 10.98%/yr vs 8.10%/yr for LVAFX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ADVDX charges 1.25%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for LVAFX.
Performance
ADVDX vs. LVAFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ADVDX achieves a 11.10% return, which is significantly higher than LVAFX's 9.92% return. Over the past 10 years, ADVDX has outperformed LVAFX with an annualized return of 10.98%, while LVAFX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.10% annualized return.
ADVDX
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -0.39%
- YTD
- 11.10%
- 6M
- 11.10%
- 1Y
- 25.65%
- 3Y*
- 15.25%
- 5Y*
- 8.17%
- 10Y*
- 10.98%
LVAFX
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -2.54%
- YTD
- 9.92%
- 6M
- 9.56%
- 1Y
- 22.10%
- 3Y*
- 13.16%
- 5Y*
- 8.10%
- 10Y*
- 8.10%
ADVDX vs. LVAFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADVDX abrdn Dynamic Dividend Fund | 11.10% | 20.33% | 7.74% | 13.35% | -13.36% | 16.80% | 10.33% | 25.43% | -9.57% | 23.36% |
LVAFX LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund | 9.92% | 22.33% | 0.10% | 9.81% | -4.04% | 17.36% | -5.16% | 17.54% | -6.47% | 18.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between ADVDX and LVAFX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015 | 0.85 |
The correlation between ADVDX and LVAFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ADVDX vs. LVAFX — Risk / Return Rank
ADVDX
LVAFX
ADVDX vs. LVAFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Dynamic Dividend Fund (ADVDX) and LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund (LVAFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ADVDX | LVAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.47 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.05 | 3.93 | -0.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.77 | 14.70 | -1.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ADVDX vs. LVAFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ADVDX drawdown since its inception was -62.03%, which is greater than LVAFX's maximum drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADVDX and LVAFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ADVDX | LVAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.03% | -33.69% | -28.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.73% | -5.76% | -2.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.06% | -17.52% | +4.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.53% | -18.34% | -6.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.33% | -33.69% | -2.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.46% | -3.53% | +1.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.44% | -4.74% | -11.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.08% | 1.54% | +0.54% |
Volatility
ADVDX vs. LVAFX - Volatility Comparison
abrdn Dynamic Dividend Fund (ADVDX) has a higher volatility of 4.00% compared to LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund (LVAFX) at 2.71%. This indicates that ADVDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVAFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ADVDX | LVAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.00% | 2.71% | +1.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.50% | 6.48% | +3.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.65% | 8.75% | +2.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.96% | 13.25% | +0.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.99% | 13.59% | +2.40% |
ADVDX vs. LVAFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ADVDX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than LVAFX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
ADVDX vs. LVAFX - Dividend Comparison
ADVDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.87%, less than LVAFX's 9.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADVDX abrdn Dynamic Dividend Fund | 7.87% | 8.53% | 5.59% | 5.70% | 6.09% | 5.35% | 5.50% | 5.70% | 6.72% | 5.73% | 6.65% | 6.67% |
LVAFX LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund | 9.26% | 10.17% | 2.71% | 15.64% | 2.90% | 2.90% | 2.14% | 7.62% | 3.59% | 7.10% | 1.66% | 1.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ADVDX and LVAFX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ADVDX has higher volatility (4.00%) compared to LVAFX (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADVDX dropped -62.03% vs LVAFX's -33.69%.
LVAFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ADVDX and LVAFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer