PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ADTN vs. CRDO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ADTN vs. CRDO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ADTRAN, Inc. (ADTN) and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADTN achieves a 102.07% return, which is significantly higher than CRDO's 49.14% return.


ADTN

1D
-3.83%
1M
-4.25%
YTD
102.07%
6M
113.37%
1Y
111.57%
3Y*
25.56%
5Y*
-2.05%
10Y*
0.79%

CRDO

1D
-6.29%
1M
19.18%
YTD
49.14%
6M
13.43%
1Y
198.39%
3Y*
135.36%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ADTN vs. CRDO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ADTN
ADTRAN, Inc.
102.07%4.32%13.49%-59.88%7.92%
CRDO
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd
49.14%114.09%245.20%46.28%14.25%

Correlation

The correlation between ADTN and CRDO is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2022

0.31

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ADTN:

$1.41B

CRDO:

$41.35B

EPS

ADTN:

-$0.37

CRDO:

$2.50

PS Ratio

ADTN:

1.25

CRDO:

30.42

PB Ratio

ADTN:

10.26

CRDO:

20.04

Total Revenue (TTM)

ADTN:

$1.12B

CRDO:

$1.34B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ADTN:

$432.77M

CRDO:

$908.35M

EBITDA (TTM)

ADTN:

$56.05M

CRDO:

$463.79M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ADTN vs. CRDO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADTN
ADTN Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ADTN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADTN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADTN Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
ADTN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADTN Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

CRDO
CRDO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
CRDO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRDO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRDO Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
CRDO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRDO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADTN vs. CRDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ADTRAN, Inc. (ADTN) and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ADTNCRDODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.74

2.35

-0.61

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.08

2.71

-0.63

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.32

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.54

3.73

-0.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.94

8.99

-0.05

ADTN vs. CRDO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADTN Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the CRDO Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADTN and CRDO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ADTNCRDODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74

2.35

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

1.18

-1.08

Drawdowns

ADTN vs. CRDO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADTN drawdown since its inception was -87.92%, which is greater than CRDO's maximum drawdown of -62.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADTN and CRDO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ADTNCRDODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.92%

-62.04%

-25.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.67%

-53.59%

+21.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-59.48%

-61.05%

+1.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-51.57%

-9.08%

-42.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.91%

-19.49%

-28.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.53%

22.17%

-9.64%

Volatility

ADTN vs. CRDO - Volatility Comparison

ADTRAN, Inc. (ADTN) has a higher volatility of 33.74% compared to Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO) at 28.92%. This indicates that ADTN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRDO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ADTNCRDODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

33.74%

28.92%

+4.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.93%

64.87%

-19.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

64.52%

86.00%

-21.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.94%

81.41%

-26.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.21%

81.41%

-31.20%

Dividends

ADTN vs. CRDO - Dividend Comparison

Neither ADTN nor CRDO has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ADTN
ADTRAN, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%3.68%1.92%1.58%2.44%3.64%3.35%1.86%1.61%2.09%
CRDO
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ADTN vs. CRDO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ADTRAN, Inc. and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M20222023202420252026
286.09M
437.00M
(ADTN) Total Revenue
(CRDO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ADTN vs. CRDO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ADTRAN, Inc. and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
39.5%
68.2%
Portfolio components
ADTN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ADTRAN, Inc. reported a gross profit of 112.99M and revenue of 286.09M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.5%.

CRDO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported a gross profit of 298.07M and revenue of 437.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.2%.

ADTN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ADTRAN, Inc. reported an operating income of 6.38M and revenue of 286.09M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.2%.

CRDO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported an operating income of 155.85M and revenue of 437.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 35.7%.

ADTN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ADTRAN, Inc. reported a net income of 4.76M and revenue of 286.09M, resulting in a net margin of 1.7%.

CRDO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported a net income of 169.10M and revenue of 437.00M, resulting in a net margin of 38.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ADTN and CRDO have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ADTN has higher volatility (33.74%) compared to CRDO (28.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADTN dropped -87.92% vs CRDO's -62.04%.

CRDO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ADTN and CRDO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer