PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ADTN vs. CIEN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ADTN vs. CIEN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ADTRAN, Inc. (ADTN) and Ciena Corporation (CIEN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADTN achieves a 102.07% return, which is significantly lower than CIEN's 165.26% return. Over the past 10 years, ADTN has underperformed CIEN with an annualized return of 0.79%, while CIEN has yielded a comparatively higher 40.28% annualized return.


ADTN

1D
-3.83%
1M
-4.25%
YTD
102.07%
6M
113.37%
1Y
111.57%
3Y*
25.56%
5Y*
-2.05%
10Y*
0.79%

CIEN

1D
-1.06%
1M
15.20%
YTD
165.26%
6M
220.85%
1Y
645.10%
3Y*
134.47%
5Y*
59.55%
10Y*
40.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ADTN vs. CIEN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ADTN
ADTRAN, Inc.
102.07%4.32%13.49%-59.88%-16.28%57.43%54.41%-5.22%-43.14%-11.96%
CIEN
Ciena Corporation
165.26%175.76%88.42%-11.71%-33.77%45.64%23.80%25.89%62.02%-14.26%

Correlation

The correlation between ADTN and CIEN is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 1997

0.42

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ADTN:

$1.41B

CIEN:

$90.45B

EPS

ADTN:

-$0.37

CIEN:

$1.58

PS Ratio

ADTN:

1.25

CIEN:

17.59

PB Ratio

ADTN:

10.26

CIEN:

32.39

Total Revenue (TTM)

ADTN:

$1.12B

CIEN:

$5.12B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ADTN:

$432.77M

CIEN:

$2.09B

EBITDA (TTM)

ADTN:

$56.05M

CIEN:

$450.47M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ADTN vs. CIEN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADTN
ADTN Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ADTN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADTN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADTN Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
ADTN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADTN Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

CIEN
CIEN Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
CIEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIEN Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
CIEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIEN Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADTN vs. CIEN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ADTRAN, Inc. (ADTN) and Ciena Corporation (CIEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ADTNCIENDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.74

9.97

-8.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.08

5.64

-3.56

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.86

-0.54

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.54

38.67

-35.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.94

113.44

-104.51

ADTN vs. CIEN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADTN Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is lower than the CIEN Sharpe Ratio of 9.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADTN and CIEN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ADTNCIENDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74

9.97

-8.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

1.25

-1.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

0.92

-0.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.08

+0.02

Drawdowns

ADTN vs. CIEN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADTN drawdown since its inception was -87.92%, smaller than the maximum CIEN drawdown of -99.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADTN and CIEN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ADTNCIENDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.92%

-99.51%

+11.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.67%

-16.84%

-14.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-59.48%

-45.51%

-13.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.99%

-49.54%

-32.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.99%

-49.54%

-32.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-51.57%

-40.72%

-10.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.91%

-87.12%

+39.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.53%

5.73%

+6.80%

Volatility

ADTN vs. CIEN - Volatility Comparison

ADTRAN, Inc. (ADTN) has a higher volatility of 33.74% compared to Ciena Corporation (CIEN) at 19.50%. This indicates that ADTN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIEN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ADTNCIENDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

33.74%

19.50%

+14.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.93%

52.85%

-7.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

64.52%

65.31%

-0.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.94%

47.89%

+7.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.21%

43.99%

+6.22%

Dividends

ADTN vs. CIEN - Dividend Comparison

Neither ADTN nor CIEN has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ADTN
ADTRAN, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%3.68%1.92%1.58%2.44%3.64%3.35%1.86%1.61%2.09%
CIEN
Ciena Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ADTN vs. CIEN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ADTRAN, Inc. and Ciena Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B20222023202420252026
286.09M
1.43B
(ADTN) Total Revenue
(CIEN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ADTN vs. CIEN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ADTRAN, Inc. and Ciena Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%20222023202420252026
39.5%
43.8%
Portfolio components
ADTN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ADTRAN, Inc. reported a gross profit of 112.99M and revenue of 286.09M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.5%.

CIEN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ciena Corporation reported a gross profit of 625.52M and revenue of 1.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.8%.

ADTN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ADTRAN, Inc. reported an operating income of 6.38M and revenue of 286.09M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.2%.

CIEN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ciena Corporation reported an operating income of 189.41M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.3%.

ADTN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ADTRAN, Inc. reported a net income of 4.76M and revenue of 286.09M, resulting in a net margin of 1.7%.

CIEN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ciena Corporation reported a net income of 150.28M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in a net margin of 10.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ADTN and CIEN have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ADTN has higher volatility (33.74%) compared to CIEN (19.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADTN dropped -87.92% vs CIEN's -99.51%.

CIEN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.97 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ADTN and CIEN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer