ADPV vs. DFND

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ADPV (Adaptiv Select ETF) and DFND (Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. ADPV is actively managed, while DFND is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ADPV returned 27.04%/yr vs 7.91%/yr for DFND. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ADPV charges 1.00%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for DFND.

Performance

ADPV vs. DFND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Adaptiv Select ETF (ADPV) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ADPV

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 6.65%
• YTD: 10.73%
• 6M: 11.05%
• 1Y: 39.30%
• 3Y*: 27.04%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DFND

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: -1.09%
• 1Y: 0.20%
• 3Y*: 7.91%
• 5Y*: 4.54%
• 10Y*: 7.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ADPV vs. DFND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
ADPV Adaptiv Select ETF	10.73%	21.19%	43.88%	-0.62%	0.57%
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF	0.00%	10.37%	8.48%	12.13%	1.98%

Correlation

The correlation between ADPV and DFND is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2022	0.18

The correlation between ADPV and DFND shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ADPV vs. DFND - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ADPV	DFND
Energy	23.7%	1.7%
Technology	15.1%	24.8%
Real Estate	11.8%	2.0%
Healthcare	11.6%	10.7%
Basic Materials	11.2%	4.3%
Consumer Cyclical	7.8%	3.5%
Communication Services	7.5%	0.8%
Utilities	7.2%	-
Industrials	7.0%	17.1%
Financial Services	4.2%	18.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.2%

Return for Risk

ADPV vs. DFND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADPV

ADPV Risk / Return Rank: 47
ADPV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
ADPV Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
ADPV Omega Ratio Rank: 43
ADPV Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
ADPV Martin Ratio Rank: 50

DFND

DFND Risk / Return Rank: 9
DFND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
DFND Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
DFND Omega Ratio Rank: 8
DFND Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
DFND Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADPV vs. DFND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Adaptiv Select ETF (ADPV) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ADPV	DFND	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.64	0.02	+1.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.19	0.11	+2.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.02	+0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.84	0.07	+2.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.42	0.13	+8.30
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ADPV vs. DFND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADPV Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is higher than the DFND Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADPV and DFND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ADPV	DFND	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.64	0.02	+1.62
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.21	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.38	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.98	0.36	+0.62

Drawdowns

ADPV vs. DFND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADPV drawdown since its inception was -22.30%, roughly equal to the maximum DFND drawdown of -22.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADPV and DFND.

Drawdown Indicators

	ADPV	DFND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.30%	-22.65%	+0.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.88%	-3.44%	-10.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.30%	-12.56%	-9.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.65%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-22.65%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.69%	+3.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.47%	-5.70%	+0.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.68%	3.70%	+0.98%

Volatility

ADPV vs. DFND - Volatility Comparison

Adaptiv Select ETF (ADPV) has a higher volatility of 5.94% compared to Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) at 0.00%. This indicates that ADPV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ADPV	DFND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.94%	0.00%	+5.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.94%	6.16%	+10.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.10%	10.92%	+13.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.84%	22.46%	-1.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.84%	19.09%	+1.75%

ADPV vs. DFND - Expense Ratio Comparison

ADPV has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than DFND's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

ADPV vs. DFND - Dividend Comparison

ADPV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, more than DFND's 0.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ADPV Adaptiv Select ETF	0.63%	0.70%	0.67%	0.22%	0.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF	0.62%	1.10%	1.64%	1.84%	0.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.77%	0.53%	0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ADPV and DFND in my portfolio?

ADPV and DFND have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ADPV or DFND?

ADPV has higher volatility (5.94%) compared to DFND (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADPV dropped -22.30% vs DFND's -22.65%.

Which ETF is better, ADPV or DFND?

On 3-year performance, ADPV leads with 27.04% vs 7.91% for DFND. On fees, ADPV is cheaper at 1.00% per year. On volatility, DFND has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ADPV or DFND?

Over the 3-year period, ADPV has performed better with a 27.04% return vs 7.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ADPV or DFND?

ADPV is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DFND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ADPV or DFND?

ADPV has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.62% for DFND.

What is the main difference between ADPV and DFND?

They also come from different issuers: Adaptiv and SRN Advisors. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for ADPV and 1.50% for DFND.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ADPV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.