PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ADPT vs. GPIQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ADPT vs. GPIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation (ADPT) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADPT achieves a 6.10% return, which is significantly lower than GPIQ's 14.86% return.


ADPT

1D
-0.81%
1M
24.14%
YTD
6.10%
6M
2.87%
1Y
63.16%
3Y*
35.41%
5Y*
-15.62%
10Y*

GPIQ

1D
-2.96%
1M
-0.00%
YTD
14.86%
6M
13.78%
1Y
32.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ADPT vs. GPIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ADPT
Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation
6.10%170.89%22.35%14.49%
GPIQ
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF
14.86%19.77%23.22%15.17%

Correlation

The correlation between ADPT and GPIQ is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2023

0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ADPT vs. GPIQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADPT
ADPT Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
ADPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADPT Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
ADPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADPT Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

GPIQ
GPIQ Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
GPIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
GPIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADPT vs. GPIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation (ADPT) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ADPTGPIQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.39

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

3.38

-1.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.22

14.28

-11.06

ADPT vs. GPIQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADPT Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the GPIQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADPT and GPIQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ADPT vs. GPIQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADPT drawdown since its inception was -96.55%, which is greater than GPIQ's maximum drawdown of -21.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADPT and GPIQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ADPTGPIQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.55%

-21.06%

-75.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.35%

-9.51%

-29.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-72.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-94.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-74.56%

-3.21%

-71.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-67.50%

-2.27%

-65.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.65%

2.25%

+17.40%

Volatility

ADPT vs. GPIQ - Volatility Comparison

Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation (ADPT) has a higher volatility of 22.28% compared to Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) at 7.78%. This indicates that ADPT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ADPTGPIQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.28%

7.78%

+14.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.80%

12.52%

+34.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.56%

15.17%

+52.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

78.41%

17.88%

+60.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

76.43%

17.88%

+58.55%

Dividends

ADPT vs. GPIQ - Dividend Comparison

ADPT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GPIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.60%.


PositionTTM202520242023
ADPT
Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GPIQ
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF
9.60%9.81%9.18%1.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


ADPT and GPIQ have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ADPT has higher volatility (22.28%) compared to GPIQ (7.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADPT dropped -96.55% vs GPIQ's -21.06%.

GPIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ADPT and GPIQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer