PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ADPT vs. MU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ADPT vs. MU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation (ADPT) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADPT achieves a 6.10% return, which is significantly lower than MU's 268.67% return.


ADPT

1D
-0.81%
1M
24.14%
YTD
6.10%
6M
2.87%
1Y
63.16%
3Y*
35.41%
5Y*
-15.62%
10Y*

MU

1D
-13.18%
1M
40.05%
YTD
268.67%
6M
281.02%
1Y
763.60%
3Y*
153.65%
5Y*
68.00%
10Y*
55.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ADPT vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ADPT
Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation
6.10%170.89%22.35%-35.86%-72.77%-52.55%97.63%-24.23%
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
268.67%240.24%-0.96%71.93%-45.93%24.21%39.79%45.19%

Correlation

The correlation between ADPT and MU is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2019

0.27

The correlation between ADPT and MU shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ADPT:

$2.68B

MU:

$1.20T

EPS

ADPT:

-$0.32

MU:

$21.26

PS Ratio

ADPT:

9.10

MU:

20.53

PB Ratio

ADPT:

12.39

MU:

16.55

Total Revenue (TTM)

ADPT:

$295.41M

MU:

$58.12B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ADPT:

$222.32M

MU:

$33.96B

EBITDA (TTM)

ADPT:

-$26.86M

MU:

$25.99B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ADPT vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADPT
ADPT Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
ADPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADPT Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
ADPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADPT Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

MU
MU Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
MU Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
MU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MU Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADPT vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation (ADPT) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ADPTMUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-9.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.75

-0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

25.47

-23.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.22

96.07

-92.85

ADPT vs. MU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADPT Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the MU Sharpe Ratio of 10.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADPT and MU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ADPT vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADPT drawdown since its inception was -96.55%, roughly equal to the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADPT and MU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ADPTMUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.55%

-98.25%

+1.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.35%

-30.28%

-9.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-72.33%

-57.63%

-14.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-94.49%

-57.63%

-36.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-74.56%

-13.18%

-61.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-67.50%

-58.13%

-9.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.65%

8.01%

+11.64%

Volatility

ADPT vs. MU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation (ADPT) is 22.28%, while Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a volatility of 37.25%. This indicates that ADPT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ADPTMUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.28%

37.25%

-14.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.80%

60.08%

-13.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.56%

72.72%

-5.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

78.41%

54.00%

+24.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

76.43%

50.44%

+25.99%

Dividends

ADPT vs. MU - Dividend Comparison

ADPT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
ADPT
Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
0.05%0.16%0.55%0.54%0.89%0.21%

Financials

ADPT vs. MU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation and Micron Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
70.87M
23.86B
(ADPT) Total Revenue
(MU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ADPT vs. MU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation and Micron Technology, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
73.6%
74.4%
Portfolio components
ADPT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation reported a gross profit of 52.17M and revenue of 70.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.6%.

MU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 17.75B and revenue of 23.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.4%.

ADPT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation reported an operating income of -19.21M and revenue of 70.87M, resulting in an operating margin of -27.1%.

MU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 16.13B and revenue of 23.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 67.6%.

ADPT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation reported a net income of -20.03M and revenue of 70.87M, resulting in a net margin of -28.3%.

MU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 13.79B and revenue of 23.86B, resulting in a net margin of 57.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ADPT and MU have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MU has higher volatility (37.25%) compared to ADPT (22.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADPT dropped -96.55% vs MU's -98.25%.

MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.61 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ADPT and MU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer