ADME vs. RBIL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ADME (Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ADME is a Hedge Fund fund tracking the Aptus Behavioral Momentum Index, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ADME returned 20.89% vs 4.57% for RBIL. At a correlation of -0.24, they often move in opposite directions. ADME charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.

Performance

ADME vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADME achieves a 9.81% return, which is significantly higher than RBIL's 2.70% return.

ADME

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: 4.45%
• YTD: 9.81%
• 6M: 8.93%
• 1Y: 20.89%
• 3Y*: 17.40%
• 5Y*: 8.23%
• 10Y*: —

RBIL

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.38%
• YTD: 2.70%
• 6M: 2.79%
• 1Y: 4.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ADME vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ADME Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF	9.81%	9.37%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	2.70%	2.91%

Correlation

The correlation between ADME and RBIL is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2025	-0.24

Return for Risk

ADME vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADME

ADME Risk / Return Rank: 62
ADME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
ADME Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
ADME Omega Ratio Rank: 60
ADME Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
ADME Martin Ratio Rank: 66

RBIL

RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 98
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADME vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ADME	RBIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.11	5.01	-2.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.01	7.92	-4.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	2.39	-1.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.80	17.00	-14.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.23	70.66	-58.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ADME vs. RBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADME Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is lower than the RBIL Sharpe Ratio of 5.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADME and RBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ADME	RBIL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.11	5.01	-2.90
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	4.28	-3.65

Drawdowns

ADME vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADME drawdown since its inception was -27.49%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADME and RBIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	ADME	RBIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.49%	-0.50%	-26.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.49%	-0.27%	-7.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.67%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.43%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.72%	0.00%	-0.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.92%	-0.06%	-7.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.71%	0.07%	+1.64%

Volatility

ADME vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison

Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME) has a higher volatility of 2.99% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.30%. This indicates that ADME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ADME	RBIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.99%	0.30%	+2.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.69%	0.79%	+6.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.95%	0.92%	+9.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.87%	1.05%	+11.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.40%	1.05%	+13.35%

ADME vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ADME has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

ADME vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

ADME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than RBIL's 4.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
ADME Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF	0.37%	0.38%	0.47%	0.78%	0.73%	0.26%	0.41%	0.70%	0.86%	0.32%	0.69%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	4.60%	3.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ADME and RBIL in my portfolio?

ADME and RBIL have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ADME or RBIL?

ADME has higher volatility (2.99%) compared to RBIL (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADME dropped -27.49% vs RBIL's -0.50%.

Which ETF is better, ADME or RBIL?

On 1-year performance, ADME leads with 20.89% vs 4.57% for RBIL. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ADME or RBIL?

Over the 1-year period, ADME has performed better with a 20.89% return vs 4.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ADME or RBIL?

RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ADME.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ADME or RBIL?

RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.60%, compared with 0.37% for ADME.

What is the main difference between ADME and RBIL?

ADME is categorized as Hedge Fund, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. ADME tracks Aptus Behavioral Momentum Index, while RBIL tracks Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. They also come from different issuers: Aptus Capital Advisors and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for ADME and 0.17% for RBIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.01 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.