PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ADME vs. BAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ADME vs. BAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME) and GraniteShares Gold Trust (BAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ADME vs. BAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ADME
Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF
-3.52%10.28%22.11%15.42%-21.80%20.24%18.21%9.31%-6.05%7.75%
BAR
GraniteShares Gold Trust
8.57%64.12%26.97%12.96%-0.55%-3.92%25.02%18.16%-1.87%-1.15%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADME achieves a -3.52% return, which is significantly lower than BAR's 8.57% return.


ADME

1D
2.21%
1M
-4.50%
YTD
-3.52%
6M
-2.99%
1Y
11.79%
3Y*
13.26%
5Y*
6.59%
10Y*

BAR

1D
3.76%
1M
-11.05%
YTD
8.57%
6M
21.20%
1Y
49.58%
3Y*
33.22%
5Y*
21.84%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ADME vs. BAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ADME has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than BAR's 0.17% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ADME vs. BAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADME
ADME Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
ADME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADME Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADME Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
ADME Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADME Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

BAR
BAR Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
BAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAR Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
BAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAR Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADME vs. BAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME) and GraniteShares Gold Trust (BAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ADMEBARDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.85

1.80

-0.95

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.28

2.24

-0.96

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.33

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

2.70

-1.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.54

9.99

-4.45

ADME vs. BAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADME Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the BAR Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADME and BAR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ADMEBARDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

1.80

-0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

1.24

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.97

-0.43

Correlation

The correlation between ADME and BAR is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

ADME vs. BAR - Dividend Comparison

ADME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, while BAR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ADME
Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF
0.42%0.38%0.47%0.78%0.73%0.26%0.41%0.70%0.86%0.32%0.69%
BAR
GraniteShares Gold Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ADME vs. BAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADME drawdown since its inception was -27.49%, which is greater than BAR's maximum drawdown of -21.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADME and BAR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ADMEBARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.49%

-21.53%

-5.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.99%

-19.19%

+10.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.43%

-20.91%

-2.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.44%

-13.22%

+7.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.05%

-6.29%

-1.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

5.19%

-3.00%

Volatility

ADME vs. BAR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME) is 4.03%, while GraniteShares Gold Trust (BAR) has a volatility of 11.01%. This indicates that ADME experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ADMEBARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.03%

11.01%

-6.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.59%

24.13%

-16.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.91%

27.63%

-13.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.88%

17.65%

-4.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.45%

16.30%

-1.85%