PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ADMA vs. WMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ADMA vs. WMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA) and Walmart Inc. (WMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADMA achieves a -54.99% return, which is significantly lower than WMT's 9.07% return. Over the past 10 years, ADMA has underperformed WMT with an annualized return of 1.84%, while WMT has yielded a comparatively higher 19.77% annualized return.


ADMA

1D
-1.32%
1M
-3.41%
YTD
-54.99%
6M
-58.49%
1Y
-61.99%
3Y*
27.09%
5Y*
35.16%
10Y*
1.84%

WMT

1D
0.45%
1M
-7.93%
YTD
9.07%
6M
4.13%
1Y
28.71%
3Y*
34.18%
5Y*
22.42%
10Y*
19.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ADMA vs. WMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ADMA
ADMA Biologics, Inc.
-54.99%6.36%279.42%16.49%175.18%-27.69%-51.25%67.36%-25.55%-37.30%
WMT
Walmart Inc.
9.07%24.49%73.99%12.88%-0.46%1.97%23.32%30.16%-3.43%46.56%

Correlation

The correlation between ADMA and WMT is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2013

0.09

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ADMA:

$1.97B

WMT:

$968.20B

EPS

ADMA:

$0.68

WMT:

$2.88

PE Ratio

ADMA:

12.13

WMT:

42.04

PS Ratio

ADMA:

3.93

WMT:

1.34

PB Ratio

ADMA:

5.05

WMT:

10.26

Total Revenue (TTM)

ADMA:

$509.86M

WMT:

$725.31B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ADMA:

$312.42M

WMT:

$181.16B

EBITDA (TTM)

ADMA:

$218.74M

WMT:

$44.32B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ADMA vs. WMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADMA
ADMA Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
ADMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADMA Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
ADMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADMA Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

WMT
WMT Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
WMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMT Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
WMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMT Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADMA vs. WMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA) and Walmart Inc. (WMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ADMAWMTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.76

1.23

-0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.98

1.83

-2.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.95

5.82

-7.77

ADMA vs. WMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADMA Sharpe Ratio is -1.14, which is lower than the WMT Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADMA and WMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ADMA vs. WMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADMA drawdown since its inception was -91.28%, which is greater than WMT's maximum drawdown of -77.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADMA and WMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ADMAWMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.28%

-77.14%

-14.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-63.48%

-15.75%

-47.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-68.99%

-21.93%

-47.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-68.99%

-25.74%

-43.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.11%

-25.74%

-60.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-66.50%

-9.81%

-56.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.05%

-14.63%

-38.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

33.85%

4.94%

+28.91%

Volatility

ADMA vs. WMT - Volatility Comparison

ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA) and Walmart Inc. (WMT) have volatilities of 9.74% and 9.86%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ADMAWMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.74%

9.86%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.54%

18.49%

+27.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.60%

23.67%

+30.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.47%

21.68%

+37.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.03%

21.73%

+47.30%

Dividends

ADMA vs. WMT - Dividend Comparison

ADMA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ADMA
ADMA Biologics, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WMT
Walmart Inc.
0.80%0.84%0.92%1.45%1.58%1.52%1.50%1.78%2.23%2.07%2.89%3.20%

Financials

ADMA vs. WMT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ADMA Biologics, Inc. and Walmart Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B20222023202420252026
114.49M
177.75B
(ADMA) Total Revenue
(WMT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ADMA vs. WMT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ADMA Biologics, Inc. and Walmart Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
70.5%
25.1%
Portfolio components
ADMA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ADMA Biologics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 80.75M and revenue of 114.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.5%.

WMT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Walmart Inc. reported a gross profit of 44.69B and revenue of 177.75B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.1%.

ADMA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ADMA Biologics, Inc. reported an operating income of 58.27M and revenue of 114.49M, resulting in an operating margin of 50.9%.

WMT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Walmart Inc. reported an operating income of 7.49B and revenue of 177.75B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.2%.

ADMA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ADMA Biologics, Inc. reported a net income of 45.33M and revenue of 114.49M, resulting in a net margin of 39.6%.

WMT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Walmart Inc. reported a net income of 5.65B and revenue of 177.75B, resulting in a net margin of 3.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ADMA and WMT have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WMT has higher volatility (9.86%) compared to ADMA (9.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADMA dropped -91.28% vs WMT's -77.14%.

WMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs -1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ADMA and WMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer