PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ADM vs. CSWC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ADM vs. CSWC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) and Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADM achieves a 41.55% return, which is significantly higher than CSWC's 11.14% return. Over the past 10 years, ADM has underperformed CSWC with an annualized return of 9.94%, while CSWC has yielded a comparatively higher 17.30% annualized return.


ADM

1D
1.70%
1M
0.46%
YTD
41.55%
6M
35.61%
1Y
59.17%
3Y*
6.06%
5Y*
6.96%
10Y*
9.94%

CSWC

1D
0.51%
1M
-0.13%
YTD
11.14%
6M
11.81%
1Y
26.38%
3Y*
18.73%
5Y*
8.54%
10Y*
17.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ADM vs. CSWC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ADM
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
41.55%18.24%-27.52%-20.42%39.98%37.33%12.44%17.10%5.28%-9.48%
CSWC
Capital Southwest Corporation
11.14%14.28%2.14%56.10%-24.63%57.40%-1.56%22.80%29.52%9.99%

Correlation

The correlation between ADM and CSWC is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 1990

0.17

The correlation between ADM and CSWC shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.24 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ADM:

$38.84B

CSWC:

$1.47B

EPS

ADM:

$2.23

CSWC:

$1.76

PE Ratio

ADM:

35.93

CSWC:

13.38

PS Ratio

ADM:

0.48

CSWC:

6.81

PB Ratio

ADM:

1.70

CSWC:

1.45

Total Revenue (TTM)

ADM:

$80.61B

CSWC:

$222.04M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ADM:

$4.70B

CSWC:

$172.70M

EBITDA (TTM)

ADM:

$3.48B

CSWC:

$142.78M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ADM vs. CSWC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADM
ADM Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ADM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADM Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
ADM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADM Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

CSWC
CSWC Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
CSWC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSWC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSWC Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
CSWC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSWC Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADM vs. CSWC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) and Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ADMCSWCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.24

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.24

1.59

+3.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.45

5.13

+9.32

ADM vs. CSWC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADM Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is higher than the CSWC Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADM and CSWC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ADM vs. CSWC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADM drawdown since its inception was -68.01%, roughly equal to the maximum CSWC drawdown of -68.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADM and CSWC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ADMCSWCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.01%

-68.33%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.79%

-15.75%

+2.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.22%

-27.74%

-21.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.14%

-33.66%

-20.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.14%

-61.15%

+7.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.23%

-2.34%

-5.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.59%

-18.35%

-3.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.63%

4.89%

-0.26%

Volatility

ADM vs. CSWC - Volatility Comparison

Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) has a higher volatility of 7.74% compared to Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) at 5.25%. This indicates that ADM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSWC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ADMCSWCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.74%

5.25%

+2.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.56%

13.93%

+5.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.30%

18.98%

+8.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.26%

22.65%

+5.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.96%

27.40%

-0.44%

Dividends

ADM vs. CSWC - Dividend Comparison

ADM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, less than CSWC's 12.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ADM
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
2.57%3.55%3.96%2.49%1.72%2.19%2.86%3.02%3.27%3.19%2.63%3.05%
CSWC
Capital Southwest Corporation
9.80%11.56%11.59%10.21%12.46%10.13%11.49%13.07%10.77%7.01%2.35%216.86%

Financials

ADM vs. CSWC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Archer-Daniels-Midland Company and Capital Southwest Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B20222023202420252026
20.49B
54.00M
(ADM) Total Revenue
(CSWC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ADM vs. CSWC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Archer-Daniels-Midland Company and Capital Southwest Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
6.0%
100.0%
Portfolio components
ADM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company reported a gross profit of 1.22B and revenue of 20.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 6.0%.

CSWC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Capital Southwest Corporation reported a gross profit of 54.00M and revenue of 54.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

ADM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company reported an operating income of 408.00M and revenue of 20.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.0%.

CSWC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Capital Southwest Corporation reported an operating income of 44.66M and revenue of 54.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 82.7%.

ADM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company reported a net income of 298.00M and revenue of 20.49B, resulting in a net margin of 1.5%.

CSWC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Capital Southwest Corporation reported a net income of 27.48M and revenue of 54.00M, resulting in a net margin of 50.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ADM and CSWC have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ADM has higher volatility (7.74%) compared to CSWC (5.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADM dropped -68.01% vs CSWC's -68.33%.

ADM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ADM and CSWC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer