ADFI vs. DBND
Compare and contrast key facts about Anfield Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (ADFI) and DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND).
ADFI and DBND are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ADFI is an actively managed fund by Anfield. It was launched on Aug 17, 2020. DBND is a passively managed fund by DoubleLine that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index. It was launched on Mar 31, 2022.
Performance
ADFI vs. DBND - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ADFI vs. DBND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADFI Anfield Dynamic Fixed Income ETF | -0.48% | 5.61% | 0.51% | 6.70% | -5.80% |
DBND DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF | -0.49% | 7.41% | 3.06% | 6.33% | -5.93% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ADFI having a -0.48% return and DBND slightly lower at -0.49%.
ADFI
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -1.61%
- YTD
- -0.48%
- 6M
- 0.37%
- 1Y
- 3.10%
- 3Y*
- 3.03%
- 5Y*
- -0.16%
- 10Y*
- —
DBND
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -2.07%
- YTD
- -0.49%
- 6M
- 0.76%
- 1Y
- 4.02%
- 3Y*
- 4.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ADFI vs. DBND - Expense Ratio Comparison
ADFI has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than DBND's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ADFI vs. DBND — Risk / Return Rank
ADFI
DBND
ADFI vs. DBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anfield Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (ADFI) and DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ADFI | DBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.56 | 1.09 | -0.53 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.81 | 1.54 | -0.73 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.20 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | 1.52 | -0.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.70 | 4.82 | -1.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ADFI | DBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 | 1.09 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.11 | 0.48 | -0.60 |
Correlation
The correlation between ADFI and DBND is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ADFI vs. DBND - Dividend Comparison
ADFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, less than DBND's 4.77% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADFI Anfield Dynamic Fixed Income ETF | 3.25% | 3.30% | 3.17% | 2.90% | 1.60% | 0.80% | 0.50% |
DBND DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF | 4.36% | 4.78% | 5.19% | 4.39% | 2.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ADFI vs. DBND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ADFI drawdown since its inception was -17.62%, which is greater than DBND's maximum drawdown of -9.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADFI and DBND.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ADFI | DBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.62% | -9.39% | -8.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.69% | -2.78% | +0.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.09% | -2.07% | -2.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.73% | -2.29% | -5.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.85% | 0.88% | -0.03% |
Volatility
ADFI vs. DBND - Volatility Comparison
Anfield Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (ADFI) has a higher volatility of 1.58% compared to DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND) at 1.46%. This indicates that ADFI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ADFI | DBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.58% | 1.46% | +0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.96% | 2.18% | +0.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.60% | 3.71% | +1.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.18% | 5.15% | +1.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.94% | 5.15% | +0.79% |