PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ADEA vs. IESC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ADEA vs. IESC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Adeia Inc (ADEA) and IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADEA achieves a 85.80% return, which is significantly lower than IESC's 92.75% return. Over the past 10 years, ADEA has underperformed IESC with an annualized return of 16.91%, while IESC has yielded a comparatively higher 48.97% annualized return.


ADEA

1D
-2.15%
1M
7.03%
YTD
85.80%
6M
144.66%
1Y
147.98%
3Y*
46.44%
5Y*
42.19%
10Y*
16.91%

IESC

1D
2.53%
1M
9.91%
YTD
92.75%
6M
62.95%
1Y
186.31%
3Y*
139.60%
5Y*
70.53%
10Y*
48.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ADEA vs. IESC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ADEA
Adeia Inc
85.80%25.22%14.75%33.53%92.17%-8.65%16.55%4.53%-21.13%-43.16%
IESC
IES Holdings, Inc.
92.75%93.58%153.67%122.72%-29.76%9.99%79.42%65.02%-9.86%-9.92%

Correlation

The correlation between ADEA and IESC is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2003

0.26

The correlation between ADEA and IESC shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (all time) to 0.43 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ADEA:

$3.65B

IESC:

$15.14B

EPS

ADEA:

$1.08

IESC:

$18.85

PE Ratio

ADEA:

29.57

IESC:

39.78

PEG Ratio

ADEA:

2.06

IESC:

0.48

PS Ratio

ADEA:

7.84

IESC:

4.17

PB Ratio

ADEA:

7.81

IESC:

14.11

Total Revenue (TTM)

ADEA:

$460.49M

IESC:

$3.63B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ADEA:

$312.21M

IESC:

$931.31M

EBITDA (TTM)

ADEA:

$235.56M

IESC:

$487.14M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ADEA vs. IESC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADEA
ADEA Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
ADEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADEA Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
ADEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADEA Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

IESC
IESC Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
IESC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IESC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
IESC Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
IESC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
IESC Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADEA vs. IESC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Adeia Inc (ADEA) and IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ADEAIESCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.40

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.86

8.09

-4.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.97

22.98

-12.01

ADEA vs. IESC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADEA Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the IESC Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADEA and IESC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ADEA vs. IESC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADEA drawdown since its inception was -80.75%, smaller than the maximum IESC drawdown of -98.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADEA and IESC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ADEAIESCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.75%

-98.32%

+17.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.81%

-21.80%

-13.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.81%

-49.23%

+14.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.97%

-54.22%

+15.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.66%

-54.28%

-19.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.91%

0.00%

-4.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.82%

-54.97%

+17.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.25%

7.66%

+4.59%

Volatility

ADEA vs. IESC - Volatility Comparison

Adeia Inc (ADEA) has a higher volatility of 23.40% compared to IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) at 15.69%. This indicates that ADEA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IESC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ADEAIESCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.40%

15.69%

+7.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.06%

50.65%

-0.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.21%

62.74%

-0.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.42%

54.09%

+8.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.47%

48.19%

+8.28%

Dividends

ADEA vs. IESC - Dividend Comparison

ADEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, while IESC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ADEA
Adeia Inc
0.63%1.16%1.43%1.61%0.95%1.06%2.39%4.32%4.35%3.28%1.81%2.67%
IESC
IES Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ADEA vs. IESC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Adeia Inc and IES Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B20222023202420252026
104.77M
974.20M
(ADEA) Total Revenue
(IESC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ADEA vs. IESC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Adeia Inc and IES Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202220232024202520260
24.5%
Portfolio components
ADEA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Adeia Inc reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 104.77M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

IESC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 238.70M and revenue of 974.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.5%.

ADEA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Adeia Inc reported an operating income of 34.83M and revenue of 104.77M, resulting in an operating margin of 33.3%.

IESC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 112.30M and revenue of 974.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.

ADEA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Adeia Inc reported a net income of 22.77M and revenue of 104.77M, resulting in a net margin of 21.7%.

IESC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 110.00M and revenue of 974.20M, resulting in a net margin of 11.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ADEA and IESC have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ADEA has higher volatility (23.40%) compared to IESC (15.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADEA dropped -80.75% vs IESC's -98.32%.

IESC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ADEA and IESC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer