ADDS vs. AAVM

Last updated Jul 28, 2026

ADDS (Hedgeye Index Adds ETF) and AAVM (Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF) are both Multi-factor funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.63 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ADDS charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for AAVM.

Performance

ADDS vs. AAVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hedgeye Index Adds ETF (ADDS) and Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF (AAVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ADDS

• 1D: -0.87%
• 1M: -3.58%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

AAVM

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: -0.07%
• 6M: 5.21%
• YTD: 13.41%
• 1Y: 25.74%
• 3Y*: 16.02%
• 5Y*: 6.38%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AAVM Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF	$43.65K	$38.53K	$68.11K
ADDS Hedgeye Index Adds ETF	$300.75K	$267.26K	$427.68K

ADDS vs. AAVM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ADDS Hedgeye Index Adds ETF	-1.41%
AAVM Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF	-3.33%

Correlation

The correlation between ADDS and AAVM is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026	0.63

Return for Risk

ADDS vs. AAVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADDS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AAVM

AAVM Risk / Return Rank: 71
AAVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
AAVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
AAVM Omega Ratio Rank: 71
AAVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
AAVM Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADDS vs. AAVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hedgeye Index Adds ETF (ADDS) and Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF (AAVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ADDS	AAVM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.61	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.31	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.30	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.38	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.06	—

Drawdowns

ADDS vs. AAVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADDS drawdown since its inception was -10.69%, smaller than the maximum AAVM drawdown of -34.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADDS and AAVM.

Drawdown Indicators

	ADDS	AAVM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.69%	-34.71%	+24.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.85%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-20.23%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-23.73%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.69%	-3.84%	-6.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.54%	-13.15%	+7.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.86%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ADDS	AAVM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.35%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.81%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.67%	16.07%	+23.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.67%	15.72%	+23.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.67%	14.93%	+24.74%

ADDS vs. AAVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

ADDS has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than AAVM's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

ADDS vs. AAVM - Dividend Comparison

ADDS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AAVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AAVM Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF	1.81%	2.05%	2.54%	4.13%	2.24%	0.82%	0.00%	1.76%	0.93%	0.81%
ADDS Hedgeye Index Adds ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ADDS and AAVM in my portfolio?

ADDS and AAVM have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ADDS or AAVM?

On fees, AAVM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ADDS or AAVM?

AAVM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for ADDS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ADDS or AAVM?

AAVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 0.00% for ADDS.

What is the main difference between ADDS and AAVM?

They also come from different issuers: Hedgeye and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for ADDS and 0.45% for AAVM.