PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ADC vs. SCHA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ADC vs. SCHA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADC achieves a 3.69% return, which is significantly lower than SCHA's 24.67% return. Over the past 10 years, ADC has underperformed SCHA with an annualized return of 9.33%, while SCHA has yielded a comparatively higher 11.91% annualized return.


ADC

1D
0.19%
1M
-2.39%
YTD
3.69%
6M
3.63%
1Y
2.60%
3Y*
8.87%
5Y*
5.31%
10Y*
9.33%

SCHA

1D
0.77%
1M
6.39%
YTD
24.67%
6M
21.39%
1Y
45.75%
3Y*
20.54%
5Y*
7.90%
10Y*
11.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ADC vs. SCHA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ADC
Agree Realty Corporation
3.69%6.62%17.20%-7.07%3.50%11.28%-1.40%22.71%19.75%16.42%
SCHA
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
24.67%11.60%11.16%18.46%-19.81%16.45%19.34%26.50%-11.79%14.94%

Correlation

The correlation between ADC and SCHA is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009

0.40

Over the past year, the correlation between ADC and SCHA has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ADC vs. SCHA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADC
ADC Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
ADC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADC Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
ADC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADC Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHA
SCHA Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SCHA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHA Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHA Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADC vs. SCHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ADCSCHADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.41

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.23

4.84

-4.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.55

17.72

-17.17

ADC vs. SCHA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADC Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is lower than the SCHA Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADC and SCHA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ADC vs. SCHA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADC drawdown since its inception was -70.25%, which is greater than SCHA's maximum drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADC and SCHA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ADCSCHADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.25%

-42.41%

-27.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.14%

-9.50%

-1.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.08%

-27.29%

+6.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.52%

-30.79%

+1.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.00%

-42.41%

+3.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.46%

0.00%

-9.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.63%

-7.56%

-2.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.76%

2.59%

+2.17%

Volatility

ADC vs. SCHA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) is 4.91%, while Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) has a volatility of 6.45%. This indicates that ADC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ADCSCHADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.91%

6.45%

-1.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.22%

13.80%

-1.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.23%

18.71%

-2.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.77%

22.03%

-3.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.67%

22.78%

+0.89%

Dividends

ADC vs. SCHA - Dividend Comparison

ADC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, more than SCHA's 0.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ADC
Agree Realty Corporation
4.26%4.28%4.26%4.64%3.95%3.65%3.61%3.25%3.65%3.94%4.17%5.43%
SCHA
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
0.96%1.26%1.51%1.42%1.37%1.19%1.05%1.39%1.58%1.24%1.50%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


ADC and SCHA have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHA has higher volatility (6.45%) compared to ADC (4.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADC dropped -70.25% vs SCHA's -42.41%.

SCHA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ADC and SCHA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer