PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ADC vs. QQQH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ADC vs. QQQH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADC achieves a 1.77% return, which is significantly lower than QQQH's 7.91% return.


ADC

1D
-0.89%
1M
-4.88%
YTD
1.77%
6M
-1.21%
1Y
0.57%
3Y*
8.22%
5Y*
4.50%
10Y*
9.63%

QQQH

1D
-0.02%
1M
4.93%
YTD
7.91%
6M
7.82%
1Y
20.09%
3Y*
20.71%
5Y*
9.42%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ADC vs. QQQH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ADC
Agree Realty Corporation
1.77%6.62%17.20%-7.07%3.50%11.28%-1.40%2.75%
QQQH
NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF
7.91%14.17%25.98%30.96%-28.35%9.76%18.62%0.31%

Correlation

The correlation between ADC and QQQH is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2019

0.16

The correlation between ADC and QQQH shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ADC vs. QQQH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADC
ADC Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
ADC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADC Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
ADC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADC Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQH
QQQH Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
QQQH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQH Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQH Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADC vs. QQQH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ADCQQQHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.39

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.05

2.90

-2.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.13

12.60

-12.47

ADC vs. QQQH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADC Sharpe Ratio is 0.04, which is lower than the QQQH Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADC and QQQH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ADCQQQHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

2.09

-2.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

0.72

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.79

-0.41

Drawdowns

ADC vs. QQQH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADC drawdown since its inception was -70.25%, which is greater than QQQH's maximum drawdown of -31.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADC and QQQH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ADCQQQHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.25%

-31.24%

-39.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.14%

-6.96%

-4.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.08%

-15.18%

-5.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.52%

-31.24%

+1.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.14%

-0.02%

-11.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.64%

-8.27%

-1.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.37%

1.60%

+2.77%

Volatility

ADC vs. QQQH - Volatility Comparison

Agree Realty Corporation (ADC) has a higher volatility of 3.87% compared to NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH) at 1.73%. This indicates that ADC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ADCQQQHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.87%

1.73%

+2.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.04%

7.34%

+4.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.92%

9.67%

+6.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.79%

13.20%

+5.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.64%

13.37%

+10.27%

Dividends

ADC vs. QQQH - Dividend Comparison

ADC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, less than QQQH's 8.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ADC
Agree Realty Corporation
4.35%4.28%4.26%4.64%3.95%3.65%3.61%3.25%3.65%3.94%4.17%5.43%
QQQH
NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF
8.74%8.86%7.53%7.18%9.05%7.77%7.48%0.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ADC and QQQH have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ADC has higher volatility (3.87%) compared to QQQH (1.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADC dropped -70.25% vs QQQH's -31.24%.

QQQH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ADC and QQQH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer