PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ADANX vs. GIMMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ADANX vs. GIMMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Diversified Arbitrage Fund Class N (ADANX) and Goldman Sachs Multi-Manager Alternatives Fund (GIMMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADANX achieves a 2.89% return, which is significantly lower than GIMMX's 7.76% return. Over the past 10 years, ADANX has outperformed GIMMX with an annualized return of 6.59%, while GIMMX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.41% annualized return.


ADANX

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.69%
YTD
2.89%
6M
3.35%
1Y
6.47%
3Y*
5.98%
5Y*
2.73%
10Y*
6.59%

GIMMX

1D
0.34%
1M
2.37%
YTD
7.76%
6M
8.32%
1Y
16.60%
3Y*
7.10%
5Y*
3.72%
10Y*
3.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ADANX vs. GIMMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ADANX
AQR Diversified Arbitrage Fund Class N
2.89%7.75%2.92%4.23%-3.54%5.99%24.85%8.33%2.02%5.59%
GIMMX
Goldman Sachs Multi-Manager Alternatives Fund
7.76%15.44%-4.85%2.78%-4.72%6.14%6.45%7.60%-3.51%-0.19%

Correlation

The correlation between ADANX and GIMMX is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.15

The correlation between ADANX and GIMMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (3 years) to 0.16 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ADANX vs. GIMMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADANX
ADANX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
ADANX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADANX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADANX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
ADANX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADANX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

GIMMX
GIMMX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
GIMMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIMMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIMMX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
GIMMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIMMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADANX vs. GIMMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Diversified Arbitrage Fund Class N (ADANX) and Goldman Sachs Multi-Manager Alternatives Fund (GIMMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ADANXGIMMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.13

1.40

+0.73

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

16.47

3.95

+12.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

45.54

12.68

+32.86

ADANX vs. GIMMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADANX Sharpe Ratio is 4.57, which is higher than the GIMMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADANX and GIMMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ADANXGIMMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.57

1.98

+2.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.05

0.64

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.54

0.63

+0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.15

0.50

+0.65

Drawdowns

ADANX vs. GIMMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADANX drawdown since its inception was -14.73%, which is greater than GIMMX's maximum drawdown of -12.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADANX and GIMMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ADANXGIMMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.73%

-12.67%

-2.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.39%

-4.18%

+3.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.70%

-10.74%

+9.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.48%

-12.67%

+5.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.73%

-12.67%

-2.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

-0.09%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.03%

-4.19%

+1.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.14%

1.31%

-1.17%

Volatility

ADANX vs. GIMMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AQR Diversified Arbitrage Fund Class N (ADANX) is 0.39%, while Goldman Sachs Multi-Manager Alternatives Fund (GIMMX) has a volatility of 1.41%. This indicates that ADANX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GIMMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ADANXGIMMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.39%

1.41%

-1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.07%

5.75%

-4.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43%

8.37%

-6.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.62%

5.83%

-3.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.28%

5.46%

-1.18%

ADANX vs. GIMMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ADANX has a 2.12% expense ratio, which is higher than GIMMX's 1.93% expense ratio.


Dividends

ADANX vs. GIMMX - Dividend Comparison

ADANX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, less than GIMMX's 7.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ADANX
AQR Diversified Arbitrage Fund Class N
1.80%1.86%0.96%2.47%0.10%0.40%1.33%1.81%6.22%6.84%6.83%4.43%
GIMMX
Goldman Sachs Multi-Manager Alternatives Fund
7.77%8.38%5.08%3.43%0.42%0.00%0.00%0.97%0.00%0.00%1.83%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


ADANX and GIMMX have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GIMMX has higher volatility (1.41%) compared to ADANX (0.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADANX dropped -14.73% vs GIMMX's -12.67%.

ADANX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.57 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ADANX and GIMMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer