PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACWU.L vs. VT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACWU.L vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS C-USD (ACWU.L) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ACWU.L having a 11.74% return and VT slightly higher at 12.24%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ACWU.L having a 12.63% annualized return and VT not far ahead at 12.74%.


ACWU.L

1D
-0.60%
1M
4.53%
YTD
11.74%
6M
13.48%
1Y
29.21%
3Y*
21.78%
5Y*
11.16%
10Y*
12.63%

VT

1D
-0.88%
1M
4.91%
YTD
12.24%
6M
13.14%
1Y
29.24%
3Y*
20.93%
5Y*
10.99%
10Y*
12.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACWU.L vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACWU.L
Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS C-USD
11.74%22.66%17.03%21.98%-18.69%19.16%16.15%26.85%-10.03%23.31%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
12.24%22.43%16.49%22.02%-18.00%18.27%16.59%26.81%-9.76%24.50%

Correlation

The correlation between ACWU.L and VT is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2014

0.38

Over the past year, ACWU.L and VT have become more correlated (0.71) than their long-term average of 0.38, meaning their price movements have been converging.

ACWU.L vs. VT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ACWU.L
VT

Technology

29.3%
27.8%

Financial Services

16.2%
15.9%

Industrials

10.9%
12.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
9.5%

Communication Services

9.0%
8.3%

Healthcare

8.1%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
4.8%

Energy

4.2%
4.3%

Basic Materials

3.7%
4.2%

Utilities

2.6%
2.7%

Real Estate

1.8%
2.4%

Technology

ACWU.L
29.3%
VT
27.8%

Financial Services

ACWU.L
16.2%
VT
15.9%

Industrials

ACWU.L
10.9%
VT
12.0%

Consumer Cyclical

ACWU.L
9.3%
VT
9.5%

Communication Services

ACWU.L
9.0%
VT
8.3%

Healthcare

ACWU.L
8.1%
VT
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

ACWU.L
5.0%
VT
4.8%

Energy

ACWU.L
4.2%
VT
4.3%

Basic Materials

ACWU.L
3.7%
VT
4.2%

Utilities

ACWU.L
2.6%
VT
2.7%

Real Estate

ACWU.L
1.8%
VT
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACWU.L vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACWU.L
ACWU.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
ACWU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

VT
VT Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACWU.L vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS C-USD (ACWU.L) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ACWU.LVTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.42

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.25

3.04

+0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.75

13.53

+0.21

ACWU.L vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACWU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the VT Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACWU.L and VT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACWU.LVTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

2.31

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.69

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.04

0.74

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.44

+0.46

Drawdowns

ACWU.L vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACWU.L drawdown since its inception was -33.80%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWU.L and VT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACWU.LVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.80%

-50.27%

+16.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.94%

-9.67%

+0.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.17%

-16.51%

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.08%

-26.38%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.80%

-34.24%

+0.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.60%

-0.88%

+0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.78%

-7.02%

+2.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.12%

2.17%

-0.05%

Volatility

ACWU.L vs. VT - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS C-USD (ACWU.L) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) have volatilities of 3.86% and 3.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACWU.LVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.86%

3.83%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.82%

10.17%

-0.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.46%

12.70%

-0.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.17%

16.05%

+3.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.45%

17.23%

+4.22%

ACWU.L vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACWU.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACWU.L vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

ACWU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWU.L
Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS C-USD
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
1.59%1.82%1.95%2.08%2.20%1.82%1.66%2.32%2.53%2.11%2.39%2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


ACWU.L and VT have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ACWU.L.

ACWU.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ACWU.L and 0.06% for VT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACWU.L and VT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer