ACWU.L vs. VT
ACWU.L (Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS C-USD) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both Global Equities funds - ACWU.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD while VT tracks the FTSE Global All Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ACWU.L returned 12.63%/yr vs 12.74%/yr for VT. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ACWU.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.
Performance
ACWU.L vs. VT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ACWU.L having a 11.74% return and VT slightly higher at 12.24%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ACWU.L having a 12.63% annualized return and VT not far ahead at 12.74%.
ACWU.L
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- 4.53%
- YTD
- 11.74%
- 6M
- 13.48%
- 1Y
- 29.21%
- 3Y*
- 21.78%
- 5Y*
- 11.16%
- 10Y*
- 12.63%
VT
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 4.91%
- YTD
- 12.24%
- 6M
- 13.14%
- 1Y
- 29.24%
- 3Y*
- 20.93%
- 5Y*
- 10.99%
- 10Y*
- 12.74%
ACWU.L vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWU.L Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS C-USD | 11.74% | 22.66% | 17.03% | 21.98% | -18.69% | 19.16% | 16.15% | 26.85% | -10.03% | 23.31% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 12.24% | 22.43% | 16.49% | 22.02% | -18.00% | 18.27% | 16.59% | 26.81% | -9.76% | 24.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACWU.L and VT is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2014 | 0.38 |
Over the past year, ACWU.L and VT have become more correlated (0.71) than their long-term average of 0.38, meaning their price movements have been converging.
ACWU.L vs. VT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ACWU.L
VT
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
ACWU.L
VT
Financial Services
ACWU.L
VT
Industrials
ACWU.L
VT
Consumer Cyclical
ACWU.L
VT
Communication Services
ACWU.L
VT
Healthcare
ACWU.L
VT
Consumer Defensive
ACWU.L
VT
Energy
ACWU.L
VT
Basic Materials
ACWU.L
VT
Utilities
ACWU.L
VT
Real Estate
ACWU.L
VT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACWU.L vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank
ACWU.L
VT
ACWU.L vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS C-USD (ACWU.L) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACWU.L | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.42 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.25 | 3.04 | +0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.75 | 13.53 | +0.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACWU.L | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.34 | 2.31 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 | 0.69 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.04 | 0.74 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.44 | +0.46 |
Drawdowns
ACWU.L vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACWU.L drawdown since its inception was -33.80%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWU.L and VT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACWU.L | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.80% | -50.27% | +16.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.94% | -9.67% | +0.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.17% | -16.51% | -0.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.08% | -26.38% | +0.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.80% | -34.24% | +0.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.60% | -0.88% | +0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.78% | -7.02% | +2.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.12% | 2.17% | -0.05% |
Volatility
ACWU.L vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS C-USD (ACWU.L) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) have volatilities of 3.86% and 3.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACWU.L | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.86% | 3.83% | +0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.82% | 10.17% | -0.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.46% | 12.70% | -0.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.17% | 16.05% | +3.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.45% | 17.23% | +4.22% |
ACWU.L vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACWU.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACWU.L vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
ACWU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWU.L Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS C-USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.59% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACWU.L and VT have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ACWU.L.
ACWU.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ACWU.L and 0.06% for VT.
Find the right allocation for ACWU.L and VT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer