ACWD.L vs. ISAC.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ACWD.L (SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF) and ISAC.L (iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Global Equities funds tracking the MSCI ACWI Index, from State Street and iShares respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ACWD.L returned 12.77%/yr vs 12.76%/yr for ISAC.L. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ACWD.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ISAC.L.

Performance

ACWD.L vs. ISAC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWD.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ACWD.L having a 11.57% return and ISAC.L slightly higher at 11.65%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ACWD.L having a 12.77% annualized return and ISAC.L not far behind at 12.76%.

ACWD.L

• 1D: -0.66%
• 1M: 4.34%
• YTD: 11.57%
• 6M: 13.24%
• 1Y: 29.71%
• 3Y*: 21.32%
• 5Y*: 11.33%
• 10Y*: 12.77%

ISAC.L

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: 4.39%
• YTD: 11.65%
• 6M: 13.33%
• 1Y: 29.59%
• 3Y*: 21.27%
• 5Y*: 11.41%
• 10Y*: 12.76%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACWD.L vs. ISAC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ACWD.L SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF	11.57%	22.83%	17.76%	22.27%	-18.37%	18.77%	15.91%	25.80%	-9.85%	24.09%
ISAC.L iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	11.65%	22.36%	17.81%	22.57%	-18.16%	18.85%	15.66%	25.77%	-9.73%	24.39%

Correlation

The correlation between ACWD.L and ISAC.L is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.99
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.99
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.99
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2011	0.94

The correlation between ACWD.L and ISAC.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

ACWD.L vs. ISAC.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ACWD.L	ISAC.L
Technology	29.2%	33.9%
Financial Services	16.5%	17.3%
Industrials	10.9%	9.0%
Consumer Cyclical	9.3%	8.5%
Communication Services	9.0%	8.6%
Healthcare	8.0%	7.8%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	4.4%
Energy	4.3%	3.6%
Basic Materials	3.6%	2.9%
Utilities	2.7%	2.2%
Real Estate	1.7%	1.2%

Return for Risk

ACWD.L vs. ISAC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACWD.L

ACWD.L Risk / Return Rank: 72
ACWD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
ACWD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
ACWD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 71
ACWD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
ACWD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 73

ISAC.L

ISAC.L Risk / Return Rank: 72
ISAC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
ISAC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
ISAC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 71
ISAC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
ISAC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACWD.L vs. ISAC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWD.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ACWD.L	ISAC.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.36	2.38	-0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.49	3.50	-0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.44	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.39	3.36	+0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.15	14.09	+0.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ACWD.L vs. ISAC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACWD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the ISAC.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACWD.L and ISAC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ACWD.L	ISAC.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.36	2.38	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73	0.73	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.80	0.80	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.73	0.75	-0.03

Drawdowns

ACWD.L vs. ISAC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACWD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.64%, roughly equal to the maximum ISAC.L drawdown of -33.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWD.L and ISAC.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACWD.L	ISAC.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.64%	-33.82%	+0.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.73%	-8.77%	+0.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.51%	-16.56%	+0.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.18%	-26.07%	-0.11%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.64%	-33.82%	+0.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.66%	-0.62%	-0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.67%	-4.69%	+0.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.09%	2.09%	0.00%

Volatility

ACWD.L vs. ISAC.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWD.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L) have volatilities of 3.87% and 3.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACWD.L	ISAC.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.87%	3.83%	+0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.89%	9.77%	+0.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.56%	12.42%	+0.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.58%	15.57%	+0.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.85%	15.95%	-0.10%

ACWD.L vs. ISAC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACWD.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than ISAC.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ACWD.L vs. ISAC.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ACWD.L nor ISAC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACWD.L and ISAC.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 1.00, ACWD.L and ISAC.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, ACWD.L or ISAC.L?

On fees, ACWD.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ACWD.L or ISAC.L?

ACWD.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ISAC.L.

What is the main difference between ACWD.L and ISAC.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for ACWD.L and 0.20% for ISAC.L.