ACWD.L vs. IWQU.L
Compare and contrast key facts about SSgA SPDR MSCI ACWI (ACWD.L) and iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS (IWQU.L).
ACWD.L and IWQU.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ACWD.L is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on May 13, 2011. IWQU.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Oct 3, 2014. Both ACWD.L and IWQU.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ACWD.L or IWQU.L.
Key characteristics
ACWD.L | IWQU.L | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 8.21% | 9.79% |
1Y Return | 22.24% | 27.05% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 5.58% | 7.75% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 10.63% | 12.20% |
Sharpe Ratio | 1.95 | 2.34 |
Daily Std Dev | 11.48% | 11.85% |
Max Drawdown | -33.64% | -33.05% |
Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -1.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACWD.L and IWQU.L is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
ACWD.L vs. IWQU.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, ACWD.L achieves a 8.21% return, which is significantly lower than IWQU.L's 9.79% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ACWD.L vs. IWQU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACWD.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IWQU.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ACWD.L vs. IWQU.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SSgA SPDR MSCI ACWI (ACWD.L) and iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS (IWQU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ACWD.L vs. IWQU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ACWD.L nor IWQU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
ACWD.L vs. IWQU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACWD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.64%, roughly equal to the maximum IWQU.L drawdown of -33.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWD.L and IWQU.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ACWD.L vs. IWQU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SSgA SPDR MSCI ACWI (ACWD.L) is 3.92%, while iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS (IWQU.L) has a volatility of 4.21%. This indicates that ACWD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWQU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.