ACWD.L vs. IB01.L
ACWD.L (SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF) and IB01.L (iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - ACWD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Index, while IB01.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ACWD.L returned 10.78%/yr vs 3.24%/yr for IB01.L. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ACWD.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IB01.L.
Performance
ACWD.L vs. IB01.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACWD.L achieves a 9.66% return, which is significantly higher than IB01.L's 1.62% return.
ACWD.L
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- YTD
- 9.66%
- 6M
- 9.52%
- 1Y
- 24.96%
- 3Y*
- 20.23%
- 5Y*
- 10.78%
- 10Y*
- 12.86%
IB01.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.62%
- 6M
- 1.70%
- 1Y
- 3.92%
- 3Y*
- 4.69%
- 5Y*
- 3.24%
- 10Y*
- —
ACWD.L vs. IB01.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWD.L SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF | 9.66% | 22.83% | 17.76% | 22.27% | -18.37% | 18.77% | 15.91% | 14.68% |
IB01.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) | 1.62% | 4.34% | 5.25% | 4.92% | 1.08% | -0.85% | 0.88% | 2.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACWD.L and IB01.L is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2019 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACWD.L vs. IB01.L — Risk / Return Rank
ACWD.L
IB01.L
ACWD.L vs. IB01.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWD.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IB01.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACWD.L | IB01.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -9.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -32.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 7.94 | -6.58 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | 113.70 | -110.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.52 | 539.03 | -527.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACWD.L vs. IB01.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACWD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.64%, which is greater than IB01.L's maximum drawdown of -1.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWD.L and IB01.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACWD.L | IB01.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.64% | -1.28% | -32.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.73% | -0.03% | -8.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.51% | -0.09% | -16.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.18% | -1.13% | -25.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.36% | 0.00% | -2.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.88% | -0.24% | -4.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.16% | 0.01% | +2.15% |
Volatility
ACWD.L vs. IB01.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWD.L) has a higher volatility of 4.20% compared to iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IB01.L) at 0.09%. This indicates that ACWD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IB01.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACWD.L | IB01.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.20% | 0.09% | +4.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.52% | 0.23% | +10.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.99% | 0.33% | +12.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.65% | 0.54% | +15.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.79% | 0.78% | +15.01% |
ACWD.L vs. IB01.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACWD.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than IB01.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ACWD.L vs. IB01.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ACWD.L nor IB01.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ACWD.L and IB01.L have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IB01.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IB01.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for ACWD.L.
ACWD.L is categorized as Global Equities, while IB01.L is Government Bonds. ACWD.L tracks MSCI ACWI Index, while IB01.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for ACWD.L and 0.07% for IB01.L.
Find the right allocation for ACWD.L and IB01.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer