ACVF vs. SELV

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

ACVF (American Conservative Values ETF) and SELV (SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ACVF returned 17.09%/yr vs 11.44%/yr for SELV. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ACVF charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SELV.

Performance

ACVF vs. SELV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF) and SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF (SELV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACVF achieves a 9.57% return, which is significantly higher than SELV's 4.65% return.

ACVF

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: 0.34%
• 6M: 7.47%
• YTD: 9.57%
• 1Y: 14.41%
• 3Y*: 17.09%
• 5Y*: 11.69%
• 10Y*: —

SELV

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: 1.85%
• 6M: 3.60%
• YTD: 4.65%
• 1Y: 10.70%
• 3Y*: 11.44%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACVF vs. SELV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
ACVF American Conservative Values ETF	9.57%	13.67%	20.56%	23.81%	-2.68%
SELV SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF	4.65%	12.86%	14.71%	6.58%	-0.61%

Correlation

The correlation between ACVF and SELV is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2022	0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between ACVF and SELV has dropped to 0.29 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

ACVF vs. SELV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ACVF	SELV
Technology	43.0%	21.4%
Financial Services	10.9%	4.8%
Industrials	10.4%	7.5%
Consumer Cyclical	10.2%	4.9%
Healthcare	7.9%	17.0%
Consumer Defensive	5.4%	12.3%
Communication Services	4.0%	15.8%
Energy	3.1%	4.3%
Utilities	1.9%	7.6%
Real Estate	1.6%	0.1%
Basic Materials	1.5%	2.8%

Return for Risk

ACVF vs. SELV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACVF

ACVF Risk / Return Rank: 44
ACVF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
ACVF Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
ACVF Omega Ratio Rank: 40
ACVF Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
ACVF Martin Ratio Rank: 54

SELV

SELV Risk / Return Rank: 41
SELV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
SELV Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
SELV Omega Ratio Rank: 38
SELV Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
SELV Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACVF vs. SELV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF) and SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF (SELV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ACVF	SELV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.19	1.16	+0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.70	1.71	-0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.20	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.88	1.81	+0.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.25	4.84	+2.41

ACVF vs. SELV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACVF Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the SELV Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACVF and SELV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ACVF vs. SELV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACVF drawdown since its inception was -24.39%, which is greater than SELV's maximum drawdown of -13.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACVF and SELV.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACVF	SELV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.39%	-13.73%	-10.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.70%	-5.92%	-1.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.82%	-8.94%	-7.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.39%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.44%	-0.34%	-1.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.69%	-2.37%	-2.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.99%	2.21%	-0.22%

Volatility

ACVF vs. SELV - Volatility Comparison

American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF) has a higher volatility of 4.11% compared to SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF (SELV) at 3.86%. This indicates that ACVF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SELV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACVF	SELV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.11%	3.86%	+0.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.02%	7.24%	+2.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.16%	9.26%	+2.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.36%	11.90%	+4.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.97%	11.90%	+4.07%

ACVF vs. SELV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACVF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SELV's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACVF vs. SELV - Dividend Comparison

ACVF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than SELV's 1.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ACVF American Conservative Values ETF	0.52%	0.59%	0.59%	0.82%	0.93%	0.61%	0.23%
SELV SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF	1.71%	1.74%	1.77%	2.06%	1.26%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACVF and SELV in my portfolio?

ACVF and SELV have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ACVF or SELV?

ACVF has higher volatility (4.11%) compared to SELV (3.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACVF dropped -24.39% vs SELV's -13.73%.

Which ETF is better, ACVF or SELV?

On 3-year performance, ACVF leads with 17.09% vs 11.44% for SELV. On fees, SELV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SELV has been the lower-risk option at 3.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ACVF or SELV?

Over the 3-year period, ACVF has performed better with a 17.09% return vs 11.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ACVF or SELV?

SELV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ACVF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ACVF or SELV?

SELV has the higher dividend yield at 1.71%, compared with 0.52% for ACVF.

What is the main difference between ACVF and SELV?

They also come from different issuers: Ridgeline Research LLC and SEI. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ACVF and 0.15% for SELV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ACVF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.