ACVF vs. IUS

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

ACVF (American Conservative Values ETF) and IUS (Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. ACVF is actively managed, while IUS is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ACVF returned 12.66%/yr vs 13.76%/yr for IUS. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ACVF charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IUS.

Performance

ACVF vs. IUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF) and Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACVF achieves a 11.18% return, which is significantly lower than IUS's 15.78% return.

ACVF

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: 6.31%
• YTD: 11.18%
• 6M: 12.23%
• 1Y: 21.98%
• 3Y*: 19.83%
• 5Y*: 12.66%
• 10Y*: —

IUS

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 4.47%
• YTD: 15.78%
• 6M: 16.24%
• 1Y: 34.12%
• 3Y*: 20.95%
• 5Y*: 13.76%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACVF vs. IUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ACVF American Conservative Values ETF	11.18%	13.67%	20.56%	23.81%	-15.74%	28.84%	13.79%
IUS Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF	15.78%	16.94%	16.51%	20.79%	-8.34%	32.17%	17.67%

Correlation

The correlation between ACVF and IUS is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2020	0.90

The correlation between ACVF and IUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

ACVF vs. IUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ACVF	IUS
Technology	39.7%	22.4%
Financial Services	11.6%	6.8%
Industrials	11.0%	9.7%
Consumer Cyclical	10.7%	10.7%
Healthcare	8.1%	12.8%
Consumer Defensive	5.9%	7.4%
Communication Services	4.2%	14.7%
Energy	3.5%	10.9%
Utilities	2.2%	1.0%
Real Estate	1.7%	0.5%
Basic Materials	1.6%	3.3%

Return for Risk

ACVF vs. IUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACVF

ACVF Risk / Return Rank: 58
ACVF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
ACVF Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
ACVF Omega Ratio Rank: 55
ACVF Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
ACVF Martin Ratio Rank: 63

IUS

IUS Risk / Return Rank: 92
IUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
IUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
IUS Omega Ratio Rank: 91
IUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
IUS Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACVF vs. IUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF) and Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ACVF	IUS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.94	3.34	-1.40
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.72	4.63	-1.91
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.61	-0.27
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.89	5.59	-2.70
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.75	23.97	-12.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ACVF vs. IUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACVF Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is lower than the IUS Sharpe Ratio of 3.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACVF and IUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ACVF	IUS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.94	3.34	-1.40
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78	0.92	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.03	0.85	+0.18

Drawdowns

ACVF vs. IUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACVF drawdown since its inception was -24.39%, smaller than the maximum IUS drawdown of -34.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACVF and IUS.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACVF	IUS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.39%	-34.67%	+10.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.70%	-6.15%	-1.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.82%	-15.61%	-1.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.39%	-18.72%	-5.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.75%	-3.87%	-0.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.89%	1.43%	+0.46%

Volatility

ACVF vs. IUS - Volatility Comparison

American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF) has a higher volatility of 3.06% compared to Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF (IUS) at 2.58%. This indicates that ACVF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACVF	IUS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.06%	2.58%	+0.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.00%	7.45%	+1.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.39%	10.26%	+1.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.23%	15.00%	+1.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.97%	18.04%	-2.07%

ACVF vs. IUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACVF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IUS's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACVF vs. IUS - Dividend Comparison

ACVF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than IUS's 1.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ACVF American Conservative Values ETF	0.53%	0.59%	0.59%	0.82%	0.93%	0.61%	0.23%	0.00%	0.00%
IUS Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF	1.28%	1.48%	1.52%	1.72%	1.78%	1.46%	1.74%	1.77%	0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACVF and IUS in my portfolio?

ACVF and IUS have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ACVF or IUS?

ACVF has higher volatility (3.06%) compared to IUS (2.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACVF dropped -24.39% vs IUS's -34.67%.

Which ETF is better, ACVF or IUS?

On 5-year performance, IUS leads with 13.76% vs 12.66% for ACVF. On fees, IUS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, IUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ACVF or IUS?

Over the 5-year period, IUS has performed better with a 13.76% return vs 12.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ACVF or IUS?

IUS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ACVF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ACVF or IUS?

IUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.53% for ACVF.

What is the main difference between ACVF and IUS?

They also come from different issuers: Ridgeline Research LLC and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ACVF and 0.19% for IUS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.34 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.