ACV vs. VTMFX
ACV (Virtus Diversified Income & Convertible Fund) and VTMFX (Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. ACV is actively managed, while VTMFX is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ACV returned 16.96%/yr vs 8.63%/yr for VTMFX. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ACV charges 2.69%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VTMFX.
Performance
ACV vs. VTMFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACV achieves a 8.29% return, which is significantly higher than VTMFX's 4.50% return. Over the past 10 years, ACV has outperformed VTMFX with an annualized return of 16.96%, while VTMFX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.63% annualized return.
ACV
- 1D
- -1.74%
- 1M
- 1.25%
- YTD
- 8.29%
- 6M
- 8.30%
- 1Y
- 35.47%
- 3Y*
- 24.45%
- 5Y*
- 9.08%
- 10Y*
- 16.96%
VTMFX
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 0.06%
- YTD
- 4.50%
- 6M
- 3.95%
- 1Y
- 13.59%
- 3Y*
- 11.82%
- 5Y*
- 6.79%
- 10Y*
- 8.63%
ACV vs. VTMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACV Virtus Diversified Income & Convertible Fund | 8.29% | 33.70% | 15.39% | 25.96% | -35.98% | 24.45% | 45.80% | 44.15% | -7.01% | 27.95% |
VTMFX Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares | 4.50% | 11.28% | 12.17% | 15.55% | -12.69% | 13.10% | 13.31% | 18.01% | -1.40% | 12.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACV and VTMFX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2015 | 0.60 |
The correlation between ACV and VTMFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACV vs. VTMFX — Risk / Return Rank
ACV
VTMFX
ACV vs. VTMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Diversified Income & Convertible Fund (ACV) and Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACV | VTMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.42 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 2.65 | -0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.21 | 12.34 | -3.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACV vs. VTMFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACV drawdown since its inception was -53.64%, which is greater than VTMFX's maximum drawdown of -28.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACV and VTMFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACV | VTMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.64% | -28.49% | -25.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.81% | -5.38% | -9.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.46% | -10.61% | -12.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.80% | -17.40% | -31.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.64% | -21.87% | -31.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.34% | -1.45% | -1.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.80% | -3.54% | -11.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.86% | 1.15% | +2.71% |
Volatility
ACV vs. VTMFX - Volatility Comparison
Virtus Diversified Income & Convertible Fund (ACV) has a higher volatility of 6.50% compared to Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares (VTMFX) at 2.56%. This indicates that ACV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACV | VTMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.50% | 2.56% | +3.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.84% | 5.22% | +9.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.38% | 6.49% | +10.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.65% | 8.57% | +15.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.85% | 9.14% | +16.71% |
ACV vs. VTMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACV has a 2.69% expense ratio, which is higher than VTMFX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACV vs. VTMFX - Dividend Comparison
ACV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.31%, more than VTMFX's 2.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACV Virtus Diversified Income & Convertible Fund | 9.31% | 9.68% | 9.84% | 10.30% | 12.69% | 24.19% | 7.28% | 8.15% | 10.76% | 9.18% | 10.67% | 5.52% |
VTMFX Vanguard Tax-Managed Balanced Fund Admiral Shares | 2.14% | 2.14% | 2.08% | 1.94% | 1.85% | 1.38% | 1.72% | 2.05% | 2.22% | 2.00% | 2.13% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACV and VTMFX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACV has higher volatility (6.50%) compared to VTMFX (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACV dropped -53.64% vs VTMFX's -28.49%.
VTMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACV and VTMFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer