ACSV vs. BSVO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ACSV (American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF) and BSVO (EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ACSV charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for BSVO.

Performance

ACSV vs. BSVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF (ACSV) and EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACSV achieves a 14.95% return, which is significantly lower than BSVO's 18.09% return.

ACSV

• 1D: -1.12%
• 1M: 1.83%
• YTD: 14.95%
• 6M: 14.45%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BSVO

• 1D: -1.86%
• 1M: 0.33%
• YTD: 18.09%
• 6M: 17.20%
• 1Y: 41.30%
• 3Y*: 18.56%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACSV vs. BSVO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ACSV American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF	14.95%	2.82%
BSVO EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF	18.09%	7.23%

Correlation

The correlation between ACSV and BSVO is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2025	0.93

Return for Risk

ACSV vs. BSVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSVO

BSVO Risk / Return Rank: 72
BSVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
BSVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
BSVO Omega Ratio Rank: 63
BSVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
BSVO Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACSV vs. BSVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF (ACSV) and EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ACSV	BSVO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.21	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.94	0.78	+1.16

Drawdowns

ACSV vs. BSVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACSV drawdown since its inception was -7.39%, smaller than the maximum BSVO drawdown of -28.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACSV and BSVO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACSV	BSVO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.39%	-28.67%	+21.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.31%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-28.67%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.12%	-1.86%	+0.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.82%	-5.73%	+3.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.91%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ACSV	BSVO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.77%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.95%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.92%	18.88%	-2.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.92%	21.72%	-5.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.92%	21.72%	-5.80%

ACSV vs. BSVO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACSV has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than BSVO's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACSV vs. BSVO - Dividend Comparison

ACSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than BSVO's 1.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
ACSV American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF	0.52%	0.43%	0.00%	0.00%
BSVO EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF	1.29%	1.52%	1.61%	1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACSV and BSVO in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, ACSV and BSVO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, ACSV or BSVO?

On fees, BSVO is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ACSV or BSVO?

BSVO is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ACSV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ACSV or BSVO?

BSVO has the higher dividend yield at 1.29%, compared with 0.52% for ACSV.

What is the main difference between ACSV and BSVO?

They also come from different issuers: American Century and Bridgeway. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for ACSV and 0.47% for BSVO.