ACSV vs. BSMC

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ACSV (American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF) and BSMC (Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ACSV charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for BSMC.

Performance

ACSV vs. BSMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF (ACSV) and Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF (BSMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACSV achieves a 19.42% return, which is significantly higher than BSMC's 10.88% return.

ACSV

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 4.26%
• YTD: 19.42%
• 6M: 17.26%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BSMC

• 1D: 1.12%
• 1M: 1.42%
• YTD: 10.88%
• 6M: 9.79%
• 1Y: 24.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACSV vs. BSMC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ACSV American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF	19.42%	0.92%
BSMC Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF	10.88%	4.79%

Correlation

The correlation between ACSV and BSMC is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2025	0.86

Return for Risk

ACSV vs. BSMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACSV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BSMC

BSMC Risk / Return Rank: 58
BSMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
BSMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
BSMC Omega Ratio Rank: 51
BSMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
BSMC Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACSV vs. BSMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF (ACSV) and Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF (BSMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ACSV	BSMC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.66	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.46	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.29	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.69	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.47	—

Drawdowns

ACSV vs. BSMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACSV drawdown since its inception was -7.39%, smaller than the maximum BSMC drawdown of -19.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACSV and BSMC.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACSV	BSMC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.39%	-19.15%	+11.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.02%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.13%	-1.51%	+1.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.73%	-2.65%	+0.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.55%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ACSV	BSMC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.82%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.34%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.24%	14.65%	+1.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.24%	16.06%	+0.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.24%	16.06%	+0.18%

ACSV vs. BSMC - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACSV has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than BSMC's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACSV vs. BSMC - Dividend Comparison

ACSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than BSMC's 0.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
ACSV American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF	0.83%	0.43%	0.00%	0.00%
BSMC Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF	0.94%	1.17%	1.02%	0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACSV and BSMC in my portfolio?

ACSV and BSMC have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ACSV or BSMC?

On fees, ACSV is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ACSV or BSMC?

ACSV is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for BSMC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ACSV or BSMC?

BSMC has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.83% for ACSV.

What is the main difference between ACSV and BSMC?

They also come from different issuers: American Century and Brandes. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for ACSV and 0.70% for BSMC.