ACSI vs. UGA
ACSI (American Customer Satisfaction ETF) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund, LP) are both exchange-traded funds - ACSI is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the American Customer Satisfaction Investable Index, while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Near-Month NYMEX RBOB Gasoline Futures Contract. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ACSI returned 9.63%/yr vs 23.69%/yr for UGA. Their 0.13 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ACSI charges 0.66%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for UGA.
Performance
ACSI vs. UGA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACSI achieves a 16.30% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 73.74% return.
ACSI
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 3.53%
- 6M
- 14.55%
- YTD
- 16.30%
- 1Y
- 22.82%
- 3Y*
- 19.09%
- 5Y*
- 9.63%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.36%
UGA
- 1D
- -4.00%
- 1M
- 4.18%
- 6M
- 57.40%
- YTD
- 73.74%
- 1Y
- 71.86%
- 3Y*
- 15.08%
- 5Y*
- 23.69%
- 10Y*
- 16.34%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.28%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $12.57K | $22.39K | $20.11K | |
| $8.76M | $6.07M | $5.03M |
ACSI vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACSI American Customer Satisfaction ETF | 16.30% | 10.70% | 22.51% | 21.06% | -20.93% | 23.33% | 22.93% | 24.88% | -4.97% | 15.77% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund, LP | 73.74% | -2.00% | 3.77% | 1.27% | 46.34% | 68.49% | -24.88% | 41.25% | -28.07% | 1.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACSI and UGA is -0.29, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2016 | 0.13 |
The correlation between ACSI and UGA shifts across timeframes, from -0.29 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACSI vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank
ACSI
UGA
ACSI vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI) and United States Gasoline Fund, LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACSI | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.32 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.95 | 3.56 | -0.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.32 | 9.88 | +1.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACSI vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACSI drawdown since its inception was -34.49%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACSI and UGA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACSI | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.49% | -86.59% | +52.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.76% | -20.32% | +12.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.27% | -26.68% | +11.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.86% | -38.11% | +13.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -14.19% | +14.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.31% | -36.52% | +31.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.02% | 7.30% | -5.28% |
Volatility
ACSI vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI) is 3.71%, while United States Gasoline Fund, LP (UGA) has a volatility of 13.00%. This indicates that ACSI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACSI | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.71% | 13.00% | -9.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.48% | 32.31% | -22.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.84% | 36.60% | -24.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.67% | 34.73% | -18.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.35% | 37.32% | -19.97% |
ACSI vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACSI has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 1.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACSI vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison
ACSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACSI American Customer Satisfaction ETF | 0.78% | 0.91% | 0.69% | 1.01% | 0.81% | 0.31% | 0.82% | 1.64% | 1.59% | 1.20% | 0.18% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund, LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACSI and UGA have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UGA has higher volatility (13.00%) compared to ACSI (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACSI dropped -34.49% vs UGA's -86.59%.
On 5-year performance, UGA leads with 23.69% vs 9.63% for ACSI. On fees, ACSI is cheaper at 0.66% per year. On volatility, ACSI has been the lower-risk option at 3.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, UGA has performed better with a 23.69% return vs 9.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ACSI is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for UGA.
ACSI has the higher dividend yield at 0.78%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.
ACSI is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while UGA is Oil & Gas. ACSI tracks American Customer Satisfaction Investable Index, while UGA tracks Near-Month NYMEX RBOB Gasoline Futures Contract. They also come from different issuers: Exponential ETFs and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for ACSI and 1.02% for UGA.
UGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACSI and UGA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer