ACSI vs. GARY

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

ACSI (American Customer Satisfaction ETF) and GARY (Mango Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. ACSI is passively managed, while GARY is actively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ACSI charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for GARY.

Performance

ACSI vs. GARY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI) and Mango Growth ETF (GARY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACSI achieves a 14.72% return, which is significantly lower than GARY's 31.48% return.

ACSI

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: 3.49%
• 6M: 12.50%
• YTD: 14.72%
• 1Y: 21.68%
• 3Y*: 18.41%
• 5Y*: 9.33%
• 10Y*: —

GARY

• 1D: 1.12%
• 1M: 1.12%
• 6M: 24.74%
• YTD: 31.48%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACSI vs. GARY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ACSI American Customer Satisfaction ETF	14.72%	0.51%
GARY Mango Growth ETF	31.48%	0.15%

Correlation

The correlation between ACSI and GARY is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2025	0.55

Return for Risk

ACSI vs. GARY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACSI

ACSI Risk / Return Rank: 72
ACSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
ACSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
ACSI Omega Ratio Rank: 70
ACSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
ACSI Martin Ratio Rank: 74

GARY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACSI vs. GARY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI) and Mango Growth ETF (GARY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ACSI	GARY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.88	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.63	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.81	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.80	—	—

Drawdowns

ACSI vs. GARY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACSI drawdown since its inception was -34.49%, which is greater than GARY's maximum drawdown of -10.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACSI and GARY.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACSI	GARY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.49%	-10.28%	-24.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.76%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.27%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.86%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-4.17%	+4.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.34%	-1.88%	-3.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.02%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ACSI	GARY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.11%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.27%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.60%	21.79%	-10.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.68%	21.79%	-5.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.37%	21.79%	-4.42%

ACSI vs. GARY - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACSI has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than GARY's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACSI vs. GARY - Dividend Comparison

ACSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, more than GARY's 0.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
ACSI American Customer Satisfaction ETF	0.80%	0.91%	0.69%	1.01%	0.81%	0.31%	0.82%	1.64%	1.59%	1.20%	0.18%
GARY Mango Growth ETF	0.04%	0.05%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACSI and GARY in my portfolio?

ACSI and GARY have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ACSI or GARY?

On fees, ACSI is cheaper at 0.66% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ACSI or GARY?

ACSI is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for GARY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ACSI or GARY?

ACSI has the higher dividend yield at 0.80%, compared with 0.04% for GARY.

What is the main difference between ACSI and GARY?

They also come from different issuers: Exponential ETFs and Mango. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for ACSI and 0.77% for GARY.