ACRNX vs. VB
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Acorn Fund (ACRNX) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB).
ACRNX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Jun 10, 1970. VB is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the CRSP US Small Cap. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004.
Performance
ACRNX vs. VB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ACRNX vs. VB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACRNX Columbia Acorn Fund | -9.00% | 4.80% | 14.46% | 21.85% | -33.80% | 8.62% | 29.65% | 26.65% | -8.82% | 25.22% |
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 1.92% | 8.87% | 14.17% | 18.22% | -17.51% | 17.57% | 19.19% | 27.34% | -9.34% | 16.26% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACRNX achieves a -9.00% return, which is significantly lower than VB's 1.92% return. Over the past 10 years, ACRNX has underperformed VB with an annualized return of 7.33%, while VB has yielded a comparatively higher 10.51% annualized return.
ACRNX
- 1D
- -1.97%
- 1M
- -12.92%
- YTD
- -9.00%
- 6M
- -7.88%
- 1Y
- 10.67%
- 3Y*
- 6.52%
- 5Y*
- -1.27%
- 10Y*
- 7.33%
VB
- 1D
- 3.18%
- 1M
- -5.13%
- YTD
- 1.92%
- 6M
- 3.76%
- 1Y
- 19.75%
- 3Y*
- 13.04%
- 5Y*
- 5.35%
- 10Y*
- 10.51%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ACRNX vs. VB - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACRNX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than VB's 0.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ACRNX vs. VB — Risk / Return Rank
ACRNX
VB
ACRNX vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Acorn Fund (ACRNX) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACRNX | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.40 | 0.91 | -0.51 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.72 | 1.41 | -0.69 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.19 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.43 | 1.39 | -0.95 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.61 | 5.97 | -4.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACRNX | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 | 0.91 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 | 0.26 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | 0.49 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.42 | +0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between ACRNX and VB is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ACRNX vs. VB - Dividend Comparison
ACRNX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACRNX Columbia Acorn Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.30% | 26.17% | 13.28% | 11.43% | 8.55% | 23.63% | 39.09% | 63.48% |
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 1.34% | 1.33% | 1.30% | 1.55% | 1.59% | 1.24% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.67% | 1.35% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
Drawdowns
ACRNX vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACRNX drawdown since its inception was -56.70%, roughly equal to the maximum VB drawdown of -59.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACRNX and VB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACRNX | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.70% | -59.56% | +2.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.63% | -14.29% | -2.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.58% | -28.15% | -17.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.58% | -42.05% | -3.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.25% | -6.08% | -14.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.78% | -8.49% | -0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.47% | 3.32% | +1.15% |
Volatility
ACRNX vs. VB - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Acorn Fund (ACRNX) has a higher volatility of 7.83% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) at 6.84%. This indicates that ACRNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ACRNX | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.83% | 6.84% | +0.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.31% | 12.60% | +2.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.40% | 21.86% | +2.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.85% | 20.78% | +4.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.88% | 21.40% | +1.48% |