ACRNX vs. NSEPX

In the year-to-date period, ACRNX achieves a -8.39% return, which is significantly lower than NSEPX's -2.52% return. Over the past 10 years, ACRNX has underperformed NSEPX with an annualized return of 6.18%, while NSEPX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.40% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

ACRNX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than NSEPX's 0.55% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Acorn Fund (ACRNX) and Columbia Select Large Cap Equity Fund (NSEPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current ACRNX Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is lower than the NSEPX Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACRNX and NSEPX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

ACRNX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NSEPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.44%.

The maximum ACRNX drawdown since its inception was -56.70%, which is greater than NSEPX's maximum drawdown of -52.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACRNX and NSEPX.

Columbia Acorn Fund (ACRNX) has a higher volatility of 6.62% compared to Columbia Select Large Cap Equity Fund (NSEPX) at 5.01%. This indicates that ACRNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NSEPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.